| Show UTAH SOAP COMPANY Answer and Cross Bill Filed By the Defendant An answer and cross bill was filed by the defendant in the federal court yesterday in the case of E L Penn of 1 Pleasant Ia Frank W Ingcr I sol and L P Ingersollof Denver vs I F Kincald John R Bruff Emma Kincald and W T DInwoodey Both I I plaintiffs and defendants are stockholders stockhold-ers in the Utah Soap company On a petition of the plaintiff on Nov 29 Judge Marshall granteJ a temporary injunction in-junction which prevented the defendants defend-ants from selling or dspcs of certain stock of the company and appear in court and answer to the charses made I against them by the plaintiffs In the petition it was claimed that Emma KIncead was fraudulently elected director di-rector by the votes of H F Kincaid and J R BruIt the plaintiff not being permitted tp be present At a later meeting without the presence of the plaintiff Kincald vas authorized to sell fifty shares of the treasury stock which i is alleged were sold to Bruff to keep the control of the majority of the stock In the hands of the defendants defend-ants The answer filed by the defendant yesterday Is a general denial of all the allegations set forth In the petition In the cross bill I is set out that F I W Ingersoll published a notice in the Deseret News calling for a meeting on Jan 16 of the stockholders of the Utah Soap company to elect directors I is shown that the recent Injunction of Judge Marshall restraining the defendants defend-ants from the possession of fifty shares gives the plaintiff the control of the stock and asks that a restraining order be Issued to prevent the plaintiffs from calling a meeting to elect directors until un-til the case Is settled In the cross bill It is stated that Bruit paid 575 per share for the fifty shares which was In advance I ad-vance of the market price The plaintiff plain-tiff is asked to appear in court Jan 23 and show cause why the temporary order or-der should not be issued In this matter Judge lilies yesterday made an order in the state district court continuing the restraining order in full force until the decision as to whether a temporary injunction shall Issue or till the United States circuit court for Utah shall determine whether I will modify Its temporary injunction in the suit of Frank W Ingersoll et al vs John R Bruff et al ap Attachment Suits The National Bank of the Republic has entered attachment suit against M S Blount doing business as the Capital J Capi-tal Grocery company to recover 500 on a promissory note The Salt Lake Fruit Produce company I com-pany is also suing the same defend j i ant to recover 5101 alleged to be due I I I for merchandise Attachments were issued in both cases and Deputy Sheriff II Montgomery levied upon certain moneys due the defendant from the I Assurance company of London and the I Orient Insurance company of London for a fire loss on the defendants premises prem-ises on Main street which occurred a week or two ago Supreme Court The following cases were disposed of in the supreme courts court-s Patrick J Holland appellant vs Elizabeth Buchanan argued by Mr D N Straup for the appellant and by Mr J B Mllner for the respondent W S Frank appellant vs the Bul lionBeck Champion Mining company com-pany argued by Mr Straup for the appellant and by Mr George Wester welt for the respondent The Herriman Irrigation company appellant vs George W Keel et 31 argued by Mr Barlow Ferguson for the appellant and by Mr Robert Hark ness for the respondent Miscellaneous Notes In the foreclosure suit of Judson H Bemis vs William Groesbeck et a a deficiency judgment for 2609067 was yesterday entered in Judge Hiles court The trial of the suit of Alfred Green et al vs William Atwood al llam Atwoo was resumed before Judge Cherry and a jur reume ye terday morning The testimony was all in when court adjourned until today when the arguments will be made and the case given to the jury Ed C Davis exdeputy sheriff vs Francis Armstrong county commissioner commis-sioner damage suit continued W S McCornick vs Henry Sadler same order In the case of Lydia Trumbo vs George 1 Wallace et aI the Btngham Copper Gold Mining company was substituted as defendant and judgment judg-ment entered by stipulation that the defendant is the owner and entitled to I the possession of the Vernard mining I claim in the West Mountain mining I district I In the case of Leon B Goldberg et al vs Nathan Tanner Jr et a a report of the sale of the property was fed In the federal court yesterday by S H Lewis master in chancery The sale was made at 12 oclock noon on a 19 at the Weber county courthouse house in Ogden the property being offered In two separate portions one of which was sold to Nathan Tanner Jr for 800 and the other to W F Adams trustee for 1575 the total sale amounting to 2375 United States Marshal Glen Miller served the papers on Alex I Wyatt yestera In the involuntary bankruptcy bank-ruptcy case filed against him in c fcd aganst the federal court |
