Show NEW POINT IN I MEM LAW LAWI I Seizure Held Held Without I j Authority By Attorney 1 j GeneralI GeneralI General I I Sp Special daI Dispatch l Dl-l at b SALT LAKE July 14 H Acts of I contain crial n coun county ty officials I In n cocOs- cocOs con confiscating eating cating and ma- ma ma materials tennis Where dealers take ave failed to I comply with the state law I ae held to be bo without authority ro no noar nr ar an a the actual IIII law III roI I I concerned according to a opinion handed down by the atter- atter n nV amy v general s 5 office today The was written h by W Hal Ital Fare Of f Ogden assistant attorney Y gen g n cral eral era eralSo n 1 So far tar as the th act ad itself attempts to provide for Cor confiscation ani for I tor without due process of ot law lawit It Is null and void old oId accord according In to the tate state law department In sup VII ll or Of this contention the th opinion points but that the law pissed as a II com corn compromise promise I at t the lant lent t alon of the I I does dos not net declare delare cl or on the scio of a a II nuisance I bt rather tho ho right In and legalizes the sale Hale In that private property cannot connot bu Ut ton nd forfeited to that hilt without due process of law aw Is la fun fun- fun d hiltI I according to Attorney s views lens judicial pro proceedings and notice to the defendant b Core his prop property nc oc ion ion- ion on- on and taken a away that por poe portion tion of oC the iret cle-iret act a t to Is lg held iid to be clearly cl arly un unconstitutional constitutional Information has hils been ben received it lh thit t She She-ift Bon Ben R It Harries ot of Salt Lake county line has made a num num- num- num ber her number of oC of WIthout pro process coo other than the tho Jaw Itself Its and It Is la Intimated that pro bp be b undertaken In th near future to 10 test th the seizure eec eec- sec sections of the new act oa 03 |