Show ARGUMENTS in the water case over the waters of ogden river arguments were continued la the second district court yesterday afternoon in the case of francis carver thomas cla rk nd john carver et al vs the norh ogden the western and the city irrigation companies on motion made by the attorneys for the defendants in the third district court restraining the defendants fend ants from further changing the course of the north fork of the ogden the attorneys tor the defendants based their motion to dissolve the injunction on the grounds that first the facts set forth in the complaint were not a sufficient cause for action second that the facts in the complaint were untrue third that the restraining order was irregularly improperly and improvidently issued tor the reason that no undertaking was required fourth that the complaint on which the restraining order was based sho djs no equity or reason why an ordinary action of law would not have salven ample relief fifth that there was a misjoinder joinder of plaintiffs in the aguon and that they were not the othera of the land described in the case aitho ame for the adjourning of court all 0 the attorneys in the case w presented aker arguments and haa submitted numerous authorities in support of their contentions today judge howell in company with one 0 the attorneys from counsel on both sides and one ot the plaintiffs and one of the defendants in the action will visit the point on the of the ogden river chere the defendants are alleged to have attempts to change the course of the stream for the purpose of in form ning is honor as to the condition stream and the topographical features of the country about |