Show C R money held by him was spent milwaukee sept 1 charles F the capitalist who was indicted three weeks ago by the grand jury on the charge of having stolen 1000 which had been placed in his hands by the wisconsin rendering company will make public tomorrow a statement showing the manner in which the which he had held for the company was disbursed after the indictment was returned the president ot tho rendering company denied that mr had milsap any ol 01 its money and since then the company has made full pay ment on notes held against it by mr poster without offering any counter claim the insinuation however has been circulated that the money lanot misappropriated appropriated mis was used for a corrupt purpose by mr the statement now issued is corroborated by the bank record showing mr rs personal account by a stata ment signed by president F G ganoss joseph and louis of the wisconsin rendering company and also by a statement issued by john J crilley the contractor contract oi to abom most of the money was paid crilley in acknowledging the payments to him explains abat at the time the city contract was awarded to bis firm he found himself unaite to enter into the contract on ot a lack 0 funds he then entered into an agreement with the wisconsin ajlen darlng company which had an established plant at that ac that company would put up with some responsible men out 0 which 1 was to ba paid the expenses crilley was put to in connection with the con i tract the work would be turned over to the rendering company mr was tedas the custodian ot this fund he had no interest with any of the baldera and paid out the money in accordance with the orders ot the parties interested and had nothing to do ata it furtner none ot tats money crilley states waa used for unlawful purposes the payments show conclusively that mr did not steal any ot the rendering companas comp anys money and also he did not use any ot it in an improper manner A supplemental statement by mr attorney disclosed tap fact that when the grand jury had the indictment under consideration two of it members together with district attorney mcgovern visited the first national banac ana there received mr rs permit sion to examine his account th found the entry showing the deposit 0 on july patently parent ly disregarded entries on her same paga showing the payments ot and respectively to crilley nor did they call upon mr pals tor for any explanation which would have put them in possession of facts showing the charge of theft to be without foundation the state ment now issued seems to show there is no basis cither for the indictment on a charge of larceny nor for fhe accusations cusat ions that the money held by mr was used by him corruptly mr statement showing the is as follows on anly 1897 F C gross president wisconsin rendering company placed in my bands this money was paid out by me as lol iown angust ath to john J cainoy aug ath 1897 to john J october 27 1897 to miller 2000 in and 1897 to F C croaa 1000 march 1901 to first national bank on account wisconsin company total AH ot these payments at the express direction of tho officers of the wisconsin rendering company and la accordance agreement under which the money was left me I 1 had neither part nor interest in nor knowledge of any efforts made by any one to secure the garbage contract referred to in the indictment against me or to secure the work to be donat at the rendering compa nySa plant or at any other place CHARGES F WORK FOR FIVE THOUSAND cleveland 0 sept L the announcement no 13 the headquarters of the amalgamated window glass workers here today that men will goto go to world tomorrow tal meana that twenty one factories representing pota will chart operations |