OCR Text |
Show i NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOIt UNITED STATES PATENT UNITED STATES LAND OFFICE, OF-FICE, Salt Lake City. Utah. Ma. 21. 1945. U. S. MINERAL SURVEY NO. 7200. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEr hat in pursuance cf an Act ol Congrers, approved May 10. 1872 COLUMBIA IRON MININO COM 'ANY, a corporation of Utah, b nd through its agent and attor iey-in-fact. E. S. O'Connor, whos-ocst whos-ocst office address ls 1002-6 Kearn lullding, Salt Lake City, Utah, ha. nade and filed an application for a United States patent for the LVTO NO. 23 LODE MINING CLAIM, situate within the Pinto fron Mining District, In Iron County, Coun-ty, Sate of Utah, and described by he official plat and field notes or file In this office and there desogp-nted desogp-nted as Mineral Survey No. 7200 said lode mining claim being slu ate in the Northwest Quarter am the Southwest quarter of Secibr 15. Township 36 South, Range 14 West, Salt Lake Meridian, the ex erlor boundaries of said Minca', Survey No. 7200 being described with magnetic declination of 14 deg. 30 mln. to 17 deg. 30 mln. East as follows: Beginning at Corner No. 1 of said Pinto No. 25 Lode Muiln-Claim, Muiln-Claim, U. S. Sur. No. 7200, from which the quarter corner for Sections Sec-tions 34 and 35. Township 36 South. Range 14 West, Salt Lake Meridian 'ears South 51 deg. 31 mln. 30 sec West 6716 feet: thence South 0 deg. 51 East. Variation 15 deg. 30 min. East. 1499.2 feet to Corner No. 2: thence North 89 deg. 13 mln. East. Variation 17 deg. 30 mln. Eart, 600.0 feet to Corner No. 3: thence North 0 deg. 51 mln West Variation 15 deg. 00 mln. East, 14992 feet to Corner No. 4; thence South 89 deg. 18 mln. West. Variation Var-iation 14 deg. 30 mln. East. 600.0 feet to Corner No. 1, the place of 'leglnnlng. Expressly excepting and excluding exclud-ing from the above description the areas In conflict with said lode mining claim, to wit: Burke No. 2 Lode Mining Claim U. 8. Lot No. 57. Burke No. 3 Lode Mining Claim U. S. Lot No. 58, excepting that part of said Burke No. S Lode Mining Claim that conflicts with Burke No. 2 Lode Mining Claim U. S. Lot No. 57. Pinto No. 5 Lode Mining Claim. U. 8. Sur. No. 4299. excepting thai part of paid Pinto No. 5 Lode Mining Claim that conflicts with the Burke No. 3 Lode Mining Claim U. S. Lot No. 58. Burkhorn Lodo Mining Claim U. 8. Sur. No. 4909. . leaving a net area claimed and ap-piled ap-piled for In this application of 13.7G2 acres, more or loss. The lode mining claims nearest ad'olnlng said Pinto No. 25 Lode Mining Claim. U. S. Mineral Survey Sur-vey No. 7200, as shown by the official of-ficial plat of survey, are as follows: fol-lows: Burke No. 2 Lode Mining Calm. U. S. Lot No. 57. Burke No 3 Lode Mining Claim U. 8. Lot No. 58. Pinto No. 5 Lode Mining Claim U 8. Sur. No. 4299. Burkhorn Lode Mining CUlm, U. 8. Stir. No. 4909. I direct that this notice be published pub-lished In tlie Iron County Record, at Cwlar Cly. Utah, weekly newi- paper and the newspaper published publish-ed nearest said mining claim, once erch week for nine consecutive weeks. SCOTT P. STEWART. Register Dickson. Fills. Perrons & McCrea, Claimant's Attorneys. 1003-6 Kearns Building. J Salt Uke City 1. Utah. JJ First Publication May 24. 1945. Lsit Pub'Jcstlon July 1941. |