Show HL I L In tn the Fourth Judicial District Court of ot the State of ot Utah In and for tor Uintah County before Judge Allen B B. B Sorensen November 9 1977 State of at Utah vs James M M. Gray The State moved the Court that this matter be dismissed In the Interest of justice The Court ordered tl this s smatter matter dismissed State of ot Utah vs James Richard Butters The State moved the Court that t thus this s smatter matter be dismissed in the Interest of justice The Court ordered this matter dismissed State of ot Utah vs James M M. Gray and James Richard Butters This matter came before the Court regularly for hearing for judgement It is the judgement and sentence of the Court that the de' de de' de James Richard Butler Buttel e confined in the Utah State Prison for an Indeterminate indeterminate indeterminate in In- determinate term of not less than one year or more than five years State of Utah vs James M M. Gray and James Richard Butters Commitment This matter came before the Court regularly for hearing for judgement It is the judgement and sentence of the Court that the defendant James M M. Gray be confined in the Utah State Prison for an indeterminate term of not less than one year nor more than five years State of Utah vs Gary Ivan Karren This being the time set for arraignment of the above named defendant the defendant defendant defendant dant was present and represented Defendant entered a plea of guilty This matter is referred to the Adult Parole and Probation Department for a Sentence Pre-Sentence investigation Sentencing is set for November 23 1977 at am a.m. The bail is ordered continued In the matter of the estate of J J. J R. R Alexander aka Johnny Ray Raydon don Alexander This matter came before the court for appointment appointment appointment ap ap- of personal representative The petition was granted as prayed for In the matter of the estate of Arthur Harrison This matter came before the court for approval approval approval ap ap- of first and final accounting accounting accounting ac ac- ac- ac counting fOJ Thera t being no objections the first and nd final accounting was ap ap- ap- ap proved In the matter of the estate of Rhoda A. A Lee aka Rhoda Ann Ami Lee This matter came before the court on a petition for sale of real property No one appearing in opposition the petition is granted as prayed for Cleo McClure and the State of Utah by and through Director Division of Family Services Utah State Dept of Social Services s vs Frank McClure This matter came before the court on an order to show cause Upon request of counsel U this s matter is continued to November 23 1977 at am a.m. The Tire Shop vs Dwane Tidwell Tidwell Trucking Attorney for the plaintiff represented to the court that this matter would be fully satisfied if the Bench Warrant were returned to the plaintiff The Court ordered that the Bench Warrant posted to the court be returned to the attorney attorney at at- torney upon his filing ac a aI I c satisfaction of judgement Arlene P. P Shaw vs Richard P. P UpOn request of attorney this matter is ordered stricken from the calendar Elaine S. S Taylor vs Garr L. L Jones This matter came before the court on an Order to Show Cause The court reserves the matter of contempt of the defendant until the matter can be heard on Its merit Water certificates of the parties are to tobe tobe be filed tiled with the clerk of the court This matter can be set for trial when notice of readiness is filed Sheila Mae Pemberton vs John Lewis Pemberton Tl This s smatter matter came before the court courton on an order to show cause Plaintiffs Plaintiff's attorney stated to the court that the defendant had disregarded the order of the court and left the state The court ordered a Bench Warrant be issued with bond set at 1000 returnable the first law and motion day after services Dora M M. Jordan vs James Jordan This matter came before the court on a notice of or readiness ess for trial By order of the court cowl this matter is ordered stricken from the calendar Sharron Kathleen Robertson vs Donald Lee Robertson Tl This s matt matter came before the court cour courton for on en a notice of readiness trial This TIlls matter is set for pi pretrial pre pre- e trial for November 23 23 1977 1971 Maty MaaD JD Nicholson v vs va Hay 5 Q Nicholson This matter came before the court on a Noti Notice e of Readiness for trial This matter Is set for tor pre trial pre trial for tor November 23 1977 1971 at am a.m. Martha Martinez vs Gilbert Martinez This matter came before the court for trial Upon request of ot counsel this matter Is ordered continued to November 23 1977 1971 Turner Building Supply vs Heber J J. J Tl This s matter came before the court for trial Upon request of Mr Anderton this matter maller is ordered continued to November 23 1977 1971 at am a.m. Willa Dean Patton Pallon vs Helen Ingram aka Helen Woolworth This matter came before the court on a summons Court ordered this matter may be set for default judgment Or on November 23 1977 1971 Woodey B B. B Searle vs Lonnie Johnson This matter came before the court on a notice of readiness for trial trial Pre-trial is set for November 23 1977 1971 at am a.m. The County of Sutter Suiter State of California vs Robert Leo Shaw This matter came before the court on an order to show cause This matter is ordered continued continued continued con con- to November 23 1977 1971 at am a.m. Raymond V. V Allan vs Vickie T. T Allan Upon request of counsel this matter is reset from November 23 1977 and set for trial on Thursday April 6 1978 at am a.m. In the Fourth Judicial District Court of the State of Utah in and for Uintah County dated November 7 8 and 1977 before Judge David Sam Dorothy L. L vs General Motors Company a cor cor- This being the time fixed for the trial by jury A jury of eight persons is sworn and impaneled to try the issues Plaintiffs Plaintiff's and defendants defendant's exhibits were offered and received Witnesses were sworn and testified and cross- cross examined The ourt court now instructs instructs instructs in in- the jury The case is then argued to the court and Jury by the respective counsel and submitted The jury retired and returns with the instructions instructions in in- that at least six of their number must agree upon all answers before returning the verdict lAVas t. t Was the fhe he defendant d. d feE l negligent in the or assembly of t sector shaft pitman pitman pitman pit pit- man arm and pinch bolt The jury is then polled Six responded in the affirmative and two responded in the negative Thereupon the jury is discharged and excused from further consideration to this case In the Fourth Judicial District Court of the State of Utah in and for Uintah Co County nty November 17 1977 before David Sam Judge State of Utah vs Bradley Joe Wagner This being the time fixed for jury trial The jury was excused The defendant now enters a plea of guilty The state made no objections The court asked the defendant to stand and he is now questioned by the Judge The sentencing is set for December 8 1977 at am a.m. The defendants defendant's counsel asked that a sentencing pre-sentencing investigation be conducted by bythe bythe bythe the Adult Probation and Parole officer This request is granted The bond is ordered continued |