| Show EW f 11 In th hI araham ca cais tr d be bel I l tr fr Julge thre 0 w WEe WEep IOme pi p liP in r f public 11 Ir rt t that th flave ben pa Hd by without ruch ge fen rill c It is II th 4 wll Ome inie up Jp and then Ulen at further nd g ter The t kI to bo be pp to Ui court cort of o Utah And an ai tY 17 thu he be to obtain IOme In Oat tb tonn r of that thaL court th fn reference to A CU II hIGh onoe Cormet n 1 tr and nd f t alA b be betWeen tWeen tW n II n portion of this and a atha dl tha ow One of t th poInt on tb 11 appeal IPP It 1 to bu 1 token taken l I the validity of tho co plaint pIat which the of an in Sate Salt Lka when It 18 f In thAt complaint that the noe VIlS In on count countr tn It La AI t Ip wee ee ho how th the tatule that Ic thu trial In county of a ClU cul partly In one and I Anth can bt be applied Iry Ind an to U 11 clue caA In which the a wile wife wai In the cOUnty That te II not an offence nor pu of t an offence If a II charge habItIng with more than one on woman 1 Salt Lake county cn be be bek b k allY when tb were tre but bu buto Ii to women In th tb G a un of t hwn by b th t 11 t have MII with I lj In this I In 10 many teu ae a au f T III bt b ac actually aun In on VY III r Judicial I I in n another The Th II I for tor t I utan tn In which the ngn for w wt Wa t in n Juab toul then Ihn a J I 19 k In fl t at IMke I fl ir III Ih ot of a hOrN hotie Jr In cc un 1 the HIng ot or Jt It In an othir Th 1111 CUI u could bi be tried I Qt I county But theta there Is II no Iw Ia living with hi Ie lega I In any county count and therefore thai tbt IJ no part ot or I a crime In hi II If the theo o rena III with 1 nr titan than on cne woman In Salt Lake county and there thre hall haa bean hut but one on lu 1 Uc In thin county how can the rationally SinN Ut the 1 of t ie lawa framed tG te meet meat In Utah a ireat iange hu has come com In the Tiet holding out and flaunting be i it t fro re the Dubilo of certain family reJa Ia I Wal t tho n hai II I I II gradually until It hu In a I great It II ron con by the portIon ot of the iii of f Ih thi system to be that the Ui who formed 11 In past pall Ind iMi who tie do not the and nut bt be In lh the or of duties doh upon th who ho ought to tor fr their own There I Is a dl to lie lenient to them UtIn within limits hut even een those thOle who wo are aN anlou not notto to th the law and yet to 10 act In a uner t to women and children c 1 1101 nt upon them are aN handicapped by Ullar rulings II ot t the court COUrtl made malle mallet madeL t L tit th conditions and not fairly d to 10 the present There to t t t same IOme of f till thu old uld th tatlo of the law of Nurl T doing violence to Its pro proper r rII II to t h a that people who 00 dr devir to do doft dor ft r l l I t ht u as a matter of an 1 1 aton ma not hi bt looked upon a 11 1 because of 01 attained and hat hal Intended to be seere and 1 i ute measure ne t o 0 be MIO Wr I that In iii Ue th CIA ease to tn be IP ap 8 will lie he an n opportunity d f to tM the court of OC last on in III thi 11 It to ittA such IUd of the MW II is If I adapted d to the UIt chaa d now aid at at the thelam lam U will not lie ha in n to 10 e sad plain laL Iatt at 01 the statutes tatul J l Kv a doubt o t In ie to 0 tome mine hi lbs e on onIt hh It is a at M hi In c ac WIth nh tM the of lbs UtI rt H 11 a t from a till eus tIM till that aut had ad sa In luck lueb cUes aI a promise from the defend I U II M t hJ hili future hell luch hellaN aN at not required la Is ordinary eal ci and tM there J Is no 1 00 Why h tile the should be demanded I this lie certainly is II right t In eap I Uw Yle view thi Is I no hO law Is reo re tINt the Judge to CO CUrt or a lie di lieto dit t to I Rth in an Court oun will doubli gi gits ts Un and aDd j |
