| OCR Text |
Show Third District CoarL The following cases were disposed of yesterday a'ternoon: In the. matter of Mark Mclvlm-rains Mclvlm-rains vs. AnJre- Wuile, iu which plaintiff sued to recover $lnt, the sealed verdict which was returned by thejury on Thursday night was opened and found to be in the plaintiff's plain-tiff's favor for 5M.6I. The case of the Leonard Park company vs. I. II. Dyer, was dismissed. dis-missed. The trial of the case of George Thurgood vs. Marshal Parsons wns taken up. The plaiutifl sues for damages alleged to havo been sustained sus-tained by him from the unliwful -oi-ure of his property by the defendant de-fendant in Augu-t, lbSO. The trial xvupivi! mot of the clay and the jury drought in a verdict for plain tiirforSIM. The cmb or GjlJen Guiver vs. George Law rence was dismissed for want of pro-ecut!ou. I uthe case of the Salt Lake City Brewing coruiany vs. J. Field ct al., judgment was rendered for .he plaintiff as prayed. The following business was done today: Ftank H. Cochrane vs. ('. A. Cussche; motion of defendant to Itseharge attachment argued; afilda-vits afilda-vits and patrol tirsUmony iutro-Juced; iutro-Juced; motion allowed; stay of four Jays alioweJ to appeal. Williams vs. O. S. Is. .t Utah Northern Hallway Co.; continued con-tinued until Nov. 1. Herniau Hill et al. vs. S. L. P. L. i H. Co.; coming on for hearing, on order to show cau-e, defendaut's move; for a continuance; overruled; plaintiff! oiler deeds showing their title. Ezra Thompson ct al; motion to file supplemental nnsner argued; allowed: demurrer filed and sul-oiittod sul-oiittod by plaintiffs; defendants allowed three days to present brief 111 demurrer. J. T. South et al vs. Lou's Cohu et al; do nurrcr to amended com-plaint com-plaint submlttuJ; overruled; exception; excep-tion; ten days to answer. John Flowers vs. Eliza Mofiat; leave to correct memorandum of cost-; otherwl-e submitted. J. H. Saudcrs vs. Sioux City Nursery Co.; motion for judgment continued ti alii Wednesday, Nov 5. W. L. Pickard vs. W. A. UIIIs, etal; motion for plaintiff for continuance con-tinuance submitted and allowed at pUintifPd cost. Lone Pine Consolidated Mining Co. vs. Ileiny Denhalter; continued till Oct. IB at 2 p.m. Ka'o Gleasou vs. J. J. Gleason; application fordlvoicr; uon-suppart tetified to by plaintiff. |
