Show VINDICATION FOR BARTCH Judge Hall Holds Snows Allegations Allega-tions Falso and Unwarranted Stricken From Files Judge Hall rendered his decision yesterday yes-terday In the case of Morrison vs the Morrison Mining corrpuny A E Know ot al The suit was brought by Mor rison to recover certain stock In the company which he alleged Snow had scoured by mlarcprcacnillon I In his anaver Snow Incorporated some serious seri-ous charges against Judge G W Darlch of the Supiiinc court charges which were false anti unwarranted according accord-ing to the decision rendered yesfor day and which are ordered stricken from the I files I Jn his Undines Judg > Ilrll says The court further finds that the allegations al-legations In the answer of A E Snow of and concerning the defendant G W Kartell here tnd are CJLlPcr and no i vl dcrcc was Introduced on the hearing tending in any decree lo sustain the ame That the said G W Eartch never neglected or refused 10 call a meeting1 of the directors of the Mor rison Mining company by reason of any antipathy to said A E Snow or otherwise and never refused to allow a meeting of tho directors to be hold That the negations that II D Claw fOil one of the directors of the IVor rlnun Mining company Is or was In any degree under or subject to the control of said G W Bartch Is false and untrue un-true That tIlt aicgatlon In the answer cC told I A E Snow that wild G 1 V Bartch Is hostile to the Interests of the Mor rison Mining company Is false and thi re Is no evhleitte tending to support That the said Bartch never located or advised the location of any mining claim 1 or property of the Morrison Mining company or on land contlruvu ous thereto and was not present whon any such locations were made and pave no advice concerning tho same and at no time has tlc said Bartch had any Interest whatever In any such clolm nor hns he done or consented that there be done any matter detrimental detri-mental to the Interests of the company com-pany That he never refused to crll a special meeting of the Morrison Mining company That said Bartch never aa vlfrcd nor procured this suit to he commented com-mented but on the contrary advised that it be not commenced and endeav oral to procure the Fame to be amicably amica-bly settled That said Bartch never requested nor demanded of said A E Snow a division of the stock of the Morrloon Mlnlrs1 company which the said Snow procured from the snld plaintiff and said Bartch never applied ap-plied to plaintiff for a portion oran or-an of the same and never In any way abetted or Induced the bringing of this suit and never in anyway any-way Influenced the plaintiff In relation rela-tion to The same ard has no Interest In the fruits of this suit and all such allegation In the answer of said A E Snow arc false and were made without with-out foundation In fact and they are not sustained by any testimony what I ever That as to the allegations In the answer relative to the defendant Uartch the court finds that they and each of them are false and that no proof has been Introduced to sustain In any degree any of said allegations flint the court finds that cs to any allegation al-legation or all < gatlonr ma do by said A1 virus E Snow of and concerning the defendant George W Bartch not herein here-in specifically rofcrrqd to Is and are not true and they and each of them are entirely without foundation and are not sustained by any proof In any degree whatever In hula I 1 conclusions of law Judge Hall eais Further That the allegations In the answer by defendant A E Snow and the defendant de-fendant Morrlfion Mining company of and concerning the defendant George W IZnrtuh are scandalous and main clous and that they he by order and decree of this court ttrlcken from tho files and records of this court as scandalous scan-dalous malicious and Impertinent nnd lhat the said defendant recover hits tosts to be taxed |