OCR Text |
Show CASES FILED IN LOWER . COURT The following cases have been filed In the Municipal court: ( Kelly & Herrick versus John C. ! Mitchell, the plaintiff asking for a ! Judgment of 3S.31 on a promissory I note. Utah Light and Rallwav company versus Fife and Sewell, for $60 on account. Harness Dix & Company versus David Campbell, for 58.50 on a promissory prom-issory note. Harness Dix & Company versus John Barrott, for $39 on a promissory note. 1 Harness Dix & Company versus Bert .Mulr, for $8.90 on a promissory j note. r Amelia ' O. Bedford versus J. D. ,l Richardson, for $27 on a promissory note. I Dr. E. M. Conroy versus Mrs. Kato f Reardon, for $136for professional I 6ervlces. Utah and Oregon Lumber company versus J. C. Gale, for $C1 on account. Georgo Lashus &. Son .versus Savage Sav-age & Bune, for $71 for damages. H- W. Hadring versus Muhs Building Build-ing company, for $10.06. for services rendered:. Kelly & Herrick versus Justin H Garner, $41.17 on a promissory note. Kelly & Herrick versus George E. Rose, $46.48 on a promissory note. In the samo court the following judgments have been rendered: Ogden State bank versus John H. Meadham et al., $91.40 and costs given plaintiff on a promissory note. Harness Dix &. Company versus Levi Dunn, $24 on a promissory note. Harness D Ix & Compuny versus Joseph Plereon, $33 awarded plaintiff on a promissory note. |