| OCR Text |
Show FIRE INSURANCE CASEJN COURT The caoo of Fred Do Michole against the London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Insur-ance company. Involving fire inw.; ranee, was resumed this morning before .Judge Howell The testimony gen cm the part of the plaintiff, K. H. Smith and others, was to the elTect thai Do MIohele'K store burned down on January -tth, of this year, and that It contained about $1.0ili worth of g.N-ds and fixtures. I kith Mr. He Mlchelo and Mr. Smith stated that the store contained Jf.w) worth of fixture and .ni) worth of goods, consisting of tobacco, groceries and can lies, etc. The defense will attempt to show-that show-that there was not $lmO worth of property burned, and that most of the 1 slock of goods carried by the l.ilntifT had been removed from the building before it caught fire. It also will try t. show- that the inventory made by . He Ml'hele was baaed upon his memory me-mory of the things he had in the store and by reference to an old inventory furnished him by Mr. Smith when Smith sold the goods to the plaintiff some time before the fire The case will occupy most of the time this afternoon, but it Is stated by the- attorney for the defense that ho will conclude today. |