Logan Republican | 1903-04-24 | Page 6 | "The Woman in Business"

, Hp "THE WOMAN IN BUSINESS." ' Hr She Explains Difference Between En- V B gagement and Wedding Rings. Sk'1 "s n new w"'nnn." ne sa'(' "' 8,iii" Kg'.', pose you will object to tho wedding i" tBiC' ring as a symbol of man's tyranny 7' ' JK; "Of courso I shall." she replied. 4 wL "Under no clrcumstnnces would I con- JHp v sent to wear such a thing. It Is not r 1R essential to a marriage, and It stands ,, In for all that Is objcctlonablo In tho t)i,M marrlago relation." tf Mi "And on tho samo theory," ho con-Is; con-Is; JKj. tinned, "I supposo you will refuso to 1 "OT?' wear an engagement ring also?" f Ml "Well no," sho answered slowly . wtk and thoughtfully. "That's a ery dif- H WuF ferent mattor." HT "But theoretically It " $$BfrU "There Is no uso arguing," sho in- ? IP Xt tcrrupted. "I don't caro what It Is the- " Hf '$ oretlcally. Practically It Is very otten i p5j ' a diamond, whllo tho wedding ring is Blfc' onIy p,aln B'1'' nn1 tlint makes n" HI 5 ' the dlfTcrcnco In tho world." mt-A. -.