OCR Text |
Show PR0V0 DEPOT FAILS! ' Mayor's Veto of R. O, w j. Sustained by CounclL' tTIHBUNB SPECIAL 1 Proto. April 7 -General v, Hancroft, Superintendent Cal'vi. Attorney P L , Williams of th"a Line were in I'roto today ana i81t conrorence with the City fv,. ' ripreeentatite citizens unc U Tonight the City Council m.i . slder tho Majors Veto onS rjrnncJo Western franhlse Ba?, f the Council one week ago J '7 Contrary tn ull expectation. Council fulled to pass the ?..' 4 oter the Majors -veto. rrlchli. The action proteins the ere-ei n depot at Troto unlets th,7i acl recoii'lders the nuestlon ""' arnndc plans for the station ? Pl another part of this Impression n been drawn and the money 1. ." "i erect the building The Iii SJ,I will nt onco take etop, to 3."it matter brouglit to the Councn ? tt' In the proper light and ask tLw franchise 1)9 granted m thai ik. V e' Inif will be erected this mJ,Iiil Mo)ot of I'roto and seteral .. Councllmen were in Salt Lav. ," week In consultation with aTillV1 drut Hancroft, nnd after thii " the .Mayor sent the eto to 1 PrSMBrl the Councllmen took tho raXl0,,?' when they returned "un |