| Show HELD ON CENTRAL BLOCK CASE Judge Diehl Says There is Evidence Enough Against Brown On That Charge CuHen Hotel Case Casel Like the Dooly Block Case Goes Glimmering was Wal another hitch In thu irown adultery caw aMII which were call called ed II before Judge Judie DIhl this afternoon As w wi n lie the matter matler na called County Atty VYe arose Ani that an all litre was no evidence Introduced In Inho ho Ihu block OM cue that he the defendant WAB nt tile the time of ot the alleged offense I now WIle auk your to n th case merel to Introduce that testimony mony mon sold said the county attorney Atty A tI Soron Soren X Christensen en was the only counsel for the defense present ent HIon thu th defendant was W I absent and Judge Diehl took his hla absence to mean an exhibition of or his contempt for tor the authority of ot the tho court Mr Christensen t Hiat at he not net to motion but that the ca e bo be continued mill Friday 1 at 10 a n in III inThe The defendant and his hili counsel knew fry ry well that these would ba b ceJ all I Hi this afternoon n said ald JudIe iehl and they have been eln here nr trilling with the court ourt Judge Diehl then granted the th I motion of he states flats attorney and Mr V Introduced Senator insurer and d In the dl vorce to prove the mar Hag Ufo i I am now ready read to decide these caws 04 said BAld tho I think the defendant ought to 10 tote te II here I 1 want him here Mr 11 r n I will Rive you until 2 30 to ret get the defendant Into court If It you OU think you ou can get him here by h that time without any other you IJIma may ma do d BO Mr Christensen en thought he could and lost no time In inn InK for tor the It was las learned h vr ver that Mr tr Brown is III not lIot appear ear In n court thU afternoon Judge Diehl then rendered liln hili decisions The took up the Cullen CUe cane first lie Ie Mid Without commenting to any great the court does not believe tha witnesses S for lor the proa from the tho told nil they know about the case cane And the court ourt would hesitate considerably In the Ic of ot tho In View of ot the witness Livingston test mony mon The Curt court does doell not believe the th state produced sufficient evidence e to show cause nM the defendant will be lie found not guilty and dla I Tho court then took up the Central Block mork case He said This cane Ig Is based b d almost entirely upon upun the testimony of ot Miss OConnell The court does not believe counsel for defense c should have assailed the wit witness ness neM as al they did In the arguments Other witnesses the defendant the woman there together MIsi 1181 Ahl h nr rd l th m In n the room at nt night II them the next morning t 1 do not take tu any alOOK In tilt the explanation of ot the defense that she heard Mr Ir to himself lt I 1 think there Is II evidence to show probable CHUM that the offense of ot I adultery was wall committed anel nd that ho will ho IX held to to the Ih Third I dIstrict court hIs reo lit The d fen e appeared to be lie highly elated over oer tho decision In the Cullen cue case ag a they th claim that WM wu the strongest CUt UK County Attorney Just the view of ot tho anti and believes the block case cage the stronger of 01 tho two CASK CASE DISMISSED DIS Judge Hall his morning dismissed the order to show cause caulle In he roPe COM of 01 I bo a belle Cameron Brown vs 11 Sheriff C l mel upon uOn the showing made by the sheriff In his hi Mrs Ira Brown Mk l that a order l I e II Auf to prevent the sheriff I from levying upon and aM wiling RIling part of ot Sen ator South Temple street prop orty rt to an execution to satisfy a Judgment of ot 1090 OW obtained br t her father The In bin hI answer stated that he hI had been beton Instructed t by b th the plaintiff In the HIp above mentioned case to dismiss the levy on the ml eH and return the ax RII which In he has and he there for any Interest In the prop r rop erty or any an portion r thereof f by Ii reason of ot said BIll levy If The court therefore till m d the order to show cause Mrs Brown will be allowed to occupy the Premises without hout rear fear of ot being ousted by the sheriff railing the prop erty under an nn execution to satisfy a Judgment against her husband SUED DY Arthur Drown Brown WM mud made defendant in another civil action tiled filed him today In the district court by tt W S 5 to the sum um of ot UW and Interest alleged to bo be due lIue dueon on three promissory notes Tho first Oret note not dated JIny 2 1901 1911 and Is for t r JUlIO on which there Is now no due the second Slay 2 1301 1901 for tor II OO bal balance ance allce due elue 1000 1000 the third Feb eb 21 2 1 for tor all of 01 which la Is now no due lIue and unpaid |
