Show j BREWERS CLAIM I I Continue J from flom page pago L 1 lj I- I IOHd and ito to lo have hn paid taxes tas an arid and in- in rest on the Pr property I orty but hut would have havo very rry ery little jf if any finy c the stockholders lEWERS STIPEND he he press Owners of Salt alt Lake r I th e as ai We vil satisfied t fled 1111 b bv the i l i in- in I turn In iii making tho the state hone bone dry I Prohibition will now bo ho brought b before roro the tho people In its full meaning A the people will be brou brought to a realization of what a strict prohibition pl law m means mans ans iy ay tho the brewers They Thc will vilI be placed in H a po position to tu decide in the future if It they wi wish h such BUCU a law Mr 11 McKinney predicted that Utah will never see tho the open saloon a again in operation hut hul wald hat hat ho lie f felt that beer her would again bo be brewed and dispensed dispensed dis dis- in Utah in a restricted and rc reg form torm Much h stress was wa lal laid upon tho compensation cum corn which Air Mr Fisher duo tile the breweries and others Interests Int rests tho the property of ot which prohibition practically practically confiscates If It 53 63 per cent nt of or the thi people arc are in favor of at prohibition they should bo be willing to pay for tor this II li right ht the seine same at as tho the brew breweries have ha paid for tor their rl right ht to tu operate raid Mr Ir Fisher r. H He ITe tilt did ld not believe bellevo that any mass or ho body of oC men had the ri right ht because of or number numbers to confiscate what J was formerly considered the legitimate teo j business s of others |