| OCR Text |
Show DIVORCE DECREE IS . lIEIJGJIBnl Supreme Court Reverses Lower Tribunal Except as to Property, FIVE OTHER DECISIONS Judgments in Railroad Cases Affirmed ; Action on Bond to Stand. Decision of the lowr 'nurt in granting grant-ing a divorce decree to Mrs. EfTa L. Doe against her husband, Charles A. Doe, was reversed hy an opinion handed hand-ed down yesterday bv Chief JnsTice P. X. Straut of the .cui-rome court and concurred in by the other justices. Doe was the plaintiff' in the divorce, but the decree was given to the wife on a counter claim. The husband appealed. ap-pealed. .Mr?. Doe made wholesale charges of immorality and neeleet in her ronnter-iMaim. ronnter-iMaim. v,hi-'h tie supreme court doe i not lin-i n bst.'i nt iat.ed by the evi.ience. Chief .liiyTiee Strnup observes that courts more readily grant defreep To wini'-n Than t- men. Ho remarks that the ordinary nac'L'ing and a - ei nation wlnrh a will1 i rifli--T - nj-nn a hr.h;ind doe- not u;n:il!y const it ute ground for dr'ovee s;ie in eceot innal caes. He tin -Is the I '" eae an exee;-t ion and I orders the de.-ree granted in the man V. ! favor. The di "i sit hi of property made bv the H ist rict court in grant trig the .io-cree .io-cree to the woman is upheld hv the en pm inn mi: rt. rxcep 't t lie al imony. Ina-nniih ?m the wife hni the hou-e for her cxn and ihe liu-bnnd inu-t 'ny off the mortgage, the ureme enurt cuts the a hmoii y from '"0 t u a month. Judgment Affirmed. A p pea I of the C n ion PaeifiV Kail-rond Kail-rond --or; p't n ;. I r-'iu the iudg:r ent of the diMnet rmirf in Weber conntv m ii suit g:ui:-f rre-trn A. HI air. 1.ar H n n "'-"n n n 1 ti '. o h r To.'L'nnJ.irr of th Hlair H arisen Ijvi'Mo- k ro-i'pan y, to recover $ 1 1 alle j-d o he due on pa vrnent of i of k . den ie.-l and Hiii'ii'i-i.t of the !ow'r i rr M:ri".'d. .C:.-'i. e .!. V,, Kr. k fa .r-t a :ro-li M'-aTtnii of t : ii.dgnf r.t. but Chief .ln'.ti.-' D. V. S'r.'iui. and .T'if.e W. M. M-- urty would imt nrnir, n the pre'.'i'in iudt.''"'rt n- a'1; r:ii".i, i T ii r"l- to he paid bv the r1: on-ient. j They had drni-'-l Cat ny fyvuienfl upon the fto-'f Ffr-' d'i fr-im them, j The cn.irt h ih ".v e t h , iu-ic merit of the ii-',ri''t i-ourl in Writer runti'v in a ard:n? $ 1 damnfc-e t,. K. " M . Thnmn In h uit :i:ui.st the C-i.-n TV; pi. i Trnit com: any for t, nri-'. The r n 1 1 w ay com pa n v h -i apprnid f he Th1 i'preine eonrt nnheld t)ie 1 i fnrt ronrt cl..iion in the ene nf W H . I j -.-I . :i l -I ! !:in t . n :i;nt ' ' . II. K'-l i IrV, 1 '1 Uhl. ll I -'pp'T -.mi t'h ' rM 'M j i ui r n t fur "tv i'im in .1 vi -, i f i pbiu" 1 in a 1 1 'r;t t i"'' of n buil-iir. Ihe 1 1 r i on rt '-, j'l'iT.i'iit v.:i" for the drf'en-ln rt. Bond Decision Stands. A j i .-ri 1 nf C e T ( -1 in ra n f r nnd S-iretv ,'ii!ii.:i'iv Jr.vr ihe ,t..'i-ion of h'" h-wer rtnirf in the ut aan:t the .r,nip:iv l.r.e.uht bv .Cdin I,vni:,n mi 1 ftion M. S:miii.-U. a" 'i.-n:ed. Pi-e aet ion ti a h t "i rivivi-r 1 ) on a i r e t y I n d in the d e I -n . 1 a n l c o m parv. Ju'i-tn.-iit -f the disTn.'t court of 'ini'''e rouiitx :n Ihe ca-e of l';irlan M.'C:irlane. r-.pi.ndenf . fljni'i-t Dr. YV. 1'. W'snterit an ! son, tibm Winter, n i pel la nt a- tmiitiril b an opinion . of the ui re'ne ronrt. MeK.T"lni;e had ; mi.- tHr damages to Inm-idi, Id- hnr-e ' and biiL'klv fl" claim that the Winters i vi 1 1 ii had "I rin'k his convey a nee. The oipr.'ine court aihrrns ti.e ;udrment! :t,-;iiiiH' the rin and remand uidgineiit :ii"aint the father io the trial court; with i ii v t ru.-l i.'i l- crant a new trial. I |