Show Justice Nielsen clearly did his duty II In I holding lIoftcn3cn for trial and If I he held him at all he1 I must necessarily I hold him for murder In the first degree That was proper and right But the delivery of a Ions written opinion in tho case which timountcQ to an argument argu-ment for the prosccution is so unusual that It naturally leads to comment There is something in manner as1 well as substance and while the substance of the Justices act In holding the prisoner pris-oner was good the way he did It Is clearly bad and a course to be avoided Twenty words signifying tho magistrates magis-trates Judgment that there was probable proba-ble cause and the prisoner would be hold for trial without ball wan all sufficient To go further served no useful purpose and shows animus not good tp see in a magistrate |