Show SUES FOR HEAVY DAMAGES Case of Jenkins vs Mammoth Mining S ning Company on Trial TRIBUNE SPECIAL Ncphl Utah JunetIn court here yesterday antl today the case of Abra ihrfin Jenkins vs the lanlmoth MlhJng company Is being hcardV Tfils Is one of about a dozen cases that were commenced com-menced against the Mammoth Mining company by men who were Injured on the cage that was being lowered in the Mammoth mine last November when the cage suddenly struck the chairs on the SCOfoot level as It was descending to the 1000foot level with twelve men on the doubledecker The plaintiff In this case sues for 10 damages for Injuries Inflicted as alleged al-leged in this wreck lie claims to be Injured about the head spine chest kidneys and abdominal viscera The defense finished its testimony today to-day when court adjourned There was very little dispute In the facts as to the manper In which the accident happened between the plaintiffs testimony and that presented by the defendant but the greater part of the day was taken up by the examination of doctors as lo the extent and permanence of the plaintiffs plain-tiffs injuries and In this the doctors for the plaintiff do not agree In scarcely one particular with the doctors for the defendant Each had their medical experts ex-perts on the stand The case will be arftugd tomorrow The case of Charles S Burnham vs the Joe Bowers Mining company was on motion of counsel for plaintIff dismissed dis-missed I The case of SusannaBarrowman vs the Mammoth Mining company has been compromised In the sum of 1200 and was dismissed The case of Ada Crumblt vs the Swansea Mining company having been compromised for 3000 was also dismissed dis-missed |