Show RECENT MINING DECISIONS prepared for the mining review mining claims where plaintiff had a mineral application for certain forties and defendant had an agricultural application for the same lands a contract between them whereby each relinquished a portion of his claim so that one could receive a part of the ground under a mineral application and the other the remaining portion under his agricultural application was not unlawful murray v white supreme court of montana pacific recovery of profits A mining company wrongfully enjoined from operating a mine is not entitled to recover on the injunction bond profits lost where it appears that on account of other mines operations were not suspended by the injunction and that the particular mine would have been worked to an uncertain extent mccornick v united states mining alining co U S circuit court of appeals federal abandonment of mining lease where a lessee under a mining lease agreed to commence mining within 12 months and continue it in order to determine whether there were minerals sufficient to warrant the payment of under the contract and neither the lessee nor his hl assigns attempted to carry out the contract until 24 years had elapsed such delay avoided the lease since unless such stipulations are performed within the time agreed upon and in good faith the law implies a kentucky diamond mining developing co v sellars court of appeals of kentucky southwestern 1016 failure of stockholder to pay assessments failure of a stockholder to pay an assessment does not forfeit his rights the corporation having a remedy to enforce payment anthony v hillsboro gold mining co supreme court of oregon pacific 95 sale of mine where one contracted to pay for a part interest in a mine and shares of stock of another mining company the price not being apportioned to the various items the contract was an entire one and where the buyer received the shares of stock in the absence of a recission and return of such stock he could not compel a repayment of his money as paid without consideration because the interest bought in the other mine was worthless perry v ayers supreme court of california pacific 46 |