OCR Text |
Show Leeds Litigation. . A number of important suits for Leeds mining property have beea planted in the Second district court, same of which will no doubt be tried at the present term of oourt. Prominent Promi-nent is that of Tischer vs. the Leedn Mining company, for $120,000 and the mine. We understand that an application for a receiver will be made at an early date in this case. The attorneys for the prosecution are Spicerof Leeds, McBride of Salt Lake and Goldthwail, late ol Pioche. Marshall Mar-shall & Royle ol Salt Lake are the company's attorneys. Gisborn fc Francis vs. the Leeds mining company, tor possession of the mine. Thin suit will most likely be tried Luis term. The attorneys are J. H. Wolcott and 0. W. Bennett for plaintifta and Marshall & Royle fur the company. Also in the case of Robert Shayky vs. Coscbina et al., together with the case ot Lyllienskyoldt cs. Hunter &. Goss. There are some othera of less, importance, im-portance, but these are sufficient to prove that Leeds possem-a valuable mining property. Beaver Square-Dealer. Square-Dealer. i |