| OCR Text |
Show THAT BOl"UHTJlTUK.SHU It i the Washington Oij.'.i that utters the following. Wc may say, however, that the case rill K- appealed ap-pealed to the Supreme Court of thz United States, should the Supreme Court of the Territory, to which it is now appealed, not sustain the judgment judg-ment of the District Court: The Supreme Court of the I oiled Stat. must now help to publish tne dL--.-accni! fact thatjudiei.il position arc bought and sold in this cwintry withl'ue consent and connivance oi tin- Washington government. In the suit of ex-Associate-Justiee Drake against ex-As.s.v:.ULJii-sneeS:riek!alid : tor-vover -.- the price of the As-s.i.:i:e-J--.'!g-s::ip in ti-.e Supreme i Court of Utah, which, the defendant j N.-- -'rt fp-m the plaintiff. Lie (. c-url i n-'-lis- rn.-l Strieki:U-.d's plea tii.u! ti... ...i.tra-.t was void KN-ause cor- 1 nip: ap.-i contrary to public i--h'.v- V-i ipp.-ai has Ken taken to the t . S. Supreme Court, and wc are curious to s e i:---w lha: Lr:l -unal will handle p e l-. -lv fa- Is in this m"st shamrful aPliir." ' j |
