Show Restriction and Retaliation It seems curious to see the name of WILLIAM WIL-LIAM XiLoro GARRISON attracted to a document docu-ment criticising the Republican party of which his father was one of the founders But Mr GARRISON has written such a Ii document and It Is issued by tho New England Tariff Reform LSaguo for effect lathe present campaign Mr GARRISONS text Js a motto flung across Boston street reading Protection Protec-tion and RecIprocity I Ono can understand I under-stand protection versus reciprocity he says but cqupled they are as incompatible as slavery andji ireedom poverty and plenty or famine and feasting He shows that a genuine reciprocity Is free trade In goods between nations but that Republican reciprocity Is nothing but re retaliation and ho gives wool as an illustration illus-tration The present tariff on wool la a benefit to England while it injures or American manufacturers Wo give to British manufacturers the advantage of eleven cents a pouna on unwashed wool enabling them to undersell us in clothes In our own market So Mr GARRISON says the motto on tho flag is delusive and instead in-stead of Protection and Reciprocity it should say Restriction and Retaliation |