Show THE v SUPREME COURT i wit Lawyers May and May Not BelieveS Believe-S 11 5 LMiRMON isi CATECHIZED 5 A New Departure Cases Stint Down J from the Supreme Tribunal The Murder Case 5 5 I At lBoclock yesterday fljndge Zane and Judge Henderson took their seats upon the bench and the bailiff proclaimed pro-claimed that the January term of the SIpreme Court bad begun Judge Boreman had not arrived from Beaver There was a fair attendance of bar members but only a casual interest appeared ap-peared to be taken in theproceedings Edward P Ferryrespondent vsJohn L Streetippellant from Third District Mr Su herland for respondent stated that Supreme Court of the United States had dismissed this case for want of jurisdiction He therefore moved that a reinittitur be issued forthwith but at the suggestion of Mr Hall attorney at-torney for appellant the motion was held for further consideration This suit involves the ownership of a part of the site of Park City Mr Sutherland moved for the admission admis-sion to the bar of H C Wyman Mr Maloney tor the admission of G G Marsh The court appointed ap-pointed Messrs Sutherland Kimball Kim-ball and Kosboroueh a committee examine into the qualifications of these gentlemen Atthe conclusion of the days business a long series of legal questions was propounded to the applicants ap-plicants by each member the committee commit-tee Mr Wyman answering the majority with readiness Mr Marsh being not quite so well upV1 At conclusion of the examination the committee announced an-nounced that they had no further questions ques-tions Judge Zauo and Judge Hender son conferred together a moment and then said they would like to have the applicants examined as to their regard for the law of the land whether they thoughtit paramount to laws or decrees promulgated by any other organization Judge Kdaborough catching the hint turn q with readihess to Mr J nand n-and elicited the information that he was Presbyterian He thought the laws of the hind supreme and pararnounj would re ognizanii bbey them Before any other laws dan other body tfiige Rosborough skirmished with Mr Marsh for some time as to his beliefs and finding that he was a Mormon plied himwith ahostot questions 4 QWhere the law 01 the United StatssJ and the law of the church came in conflict which would you consider paramount A = The law of the United States Q Suppose yon were cognizant of the fact of a violation of the law would you as a citizen expose the parties AYes I think I would though I dontthiuk it would be my duty to be so officious as to pry into family matters S QIfycuknewof a murder being committed you would = expose the perpetrator per-petrator would you 1 AI would QAnd would it not equally be your duty to expose an unlawinl marriage AWell as I have said I dont pry into family matters QI dont mean prying into Suppose Sup-pose the knowledge came to you naturally natur-ally would you think it your duty to inform the DistrictAttorney or a Grand Juror 1 S AWelI I think it would if I knew all the facts QDo you believe that the execution of the law here is persecution 45No I dont think I do Polygamy Polyg-amy and unlawful cohabitation are crimes against the law and I suppose people must be punished for disobeying the law QAre you still a Mormon AWell I think my name is still on the books S QDo you believe that the soaalled revelations to Jo Smith were of uivine origin I AWell it depends on whateyou mean bv revelation 5 QWhat is your definition of revelation reve-lation 1 AI think men are receiving revelations reve-lations most of the time Newton may have had a revelation when he saw the apple fall from the tree that is a rave lation to his mind QWell do you thinkwJo Smith evolved hb revelations from5sjfnward consciousness or that he receivedthem from God 1 AWeH he may have had certain impressions which were abstract truths Jf as wo have all been taught there is such 1 thingasfe God thenJhe1 has Supreme Su-preme control of all the earth t i7 QDb you believe in the Mormon doctrines 5 S AY as I understand them QDo you believe them as at present taught l by the constituted authorities 5 3 AVel1 there are twojwiys ofjlook ing at all questions In everv church there are different views held fy different differ-ent men 9 QTbat would baa schism wouldnt it1 j S V Ac3 I don t know that it would This line of questioning andftnswering was kept up for ome time with ont any bine direct being < elici ted Mr Marsh taking considerable consider-able time to frame his replies which were evidently not sufficientlv exploit to suit Judge Rosborough The committee consulted together for a moment and then said their r port would be submitted in writing this morning At this Mr Wyman said he was forced to leave for dilvtr Reef this morning and if his Case could be disposed of last evening hs would esteem it a favpr The cont milieu again consulted and then announced that as their report would be iu favor of Mr Wytuans admission the oath mitht be administered to him then so as not to interfere with his departure Clerk Sprague accordingly administered the usual oath and Mr Wyman was admitted to the bar HP gardmg Mr Marsh the committee announced that their report would be made this morning James W Campbell et al I respon dents vs James J OReilly et al appellants from Third District Dis-trict The mandate of the bu preme Court of the United States affirming the judgment of this court was read ana on motion Thomas Marshall for espondeJl1si was ordered that attenjijtitur issue i Jr6rthwItH This suit involves a mine in Bingham and is of several years standing J Th Peoplef respondents vs Thus Tidwell appellant and the People vs Edward Olsen appellant from the First District A pe Ition for a rehearing of these causes was submitted and taken under advisement Ceurt then adjourned until today at 10 oclock am |