| Show wy T or raw f THE NOMINEES what essay thinks of th w the charge so arbel made by the republican fafty against alid democrats th atthe latter always make a bubb blander by which cheit opportunities tuni ties re thrown away should noar be withdrawn on alio principle that those who of glass should not throw stones if alio llio ranks of republicanism hid been raked from stem to stern a ticket than that put up at chicci Chic ii could not have been with an exception perhaps in the case af 17 S grant gardell Gard eld while being ft man of splendid talents and mafura bly liberal in his views has to use the language ot a pennsylvanian in alie house of representatives aifsen through clouds of suspicion if not of guill those who pronounce his record stainless and cither pervert or are in ignorance for it has been bin rarely that a dis gusling piece of washington jobbing has been unearthed in which garneld did not figure conspicuously the back pay steal the credit the me garrahan Gar ruhan claim the chorpenning claim the de golyer patent swindle the electoral commission infamy the southern election frauds ac ac might be cited as rebutting evidence against the claim they do not constitute the chapter by anny means still he is above the average of republicans and with a siroog man on the rear of the ticket would doubtless have made a good fight but such a name as arthur acts but as a mi Htone where a buoy is needed he belina to the conkling leet sto kins slur eliy custom house linof new york and is as objectionable to influential ind independent republicans like george wm cunis who number tens of thousands in alio empire state as grant himself be the republican ticket ii foredoomed fore doomed to defeat for it hai deliberately squandered the little hope it ever had of carrying new york without which no party can succeed these may not be the views of the but they are nyne and it they prove incorrect here is no such thing as political certainty in aliis country ESSAY june |
