OCR Text |
Show uu 1 CRITICISM OF A "FAT" STORY We were criticized for tolling fat peoplo to "tender" 75 cents to their druggists for a large case of Marmola Tablets. Several wrote in saying tho uso of tho word "tender" was incorrect, incor-rect, that "tender" in such a connection connec-tion raised the impression the druggist drug-gist might refuse 75 cents as Insufficient. Insuffi-cient. Now, isn't that odd? A few weeks ago 75 ccnLs was "tendered" to a Broadway druggist and he did refuse it. That is, he said ho had no Marmola Tablets, whereas he did have seven cases. But the wholesale house was closed, it being on a Saturday, and he had to prevaricate to protect his regular reg-ular customers, who absorbed thoso seven cases later in the day. This elegant pharmaceutical adaptation adapta-tion of that famous, fashionable fat reducer, re-ducer, the Marmola Prescription (viz., k oz. Marmola, oz. Fl. Ex. Cascara Aromatic, 4 oz. Peppermint Water), is certainly having a remarkable vogue. Millions af cases of tablets are sold yearly and their famo grows. This is doubtless because of their bamless-ness bamless-ness (guaranteed by tho Marmola Co., 864 Woodward avenue. Detroit, Mich.), and sure ability to removo ten to sixteen six-teen ounces of fat (not flesh) a day without inconvenience, bother, need for exercising or interference with the taker's appetite for good things. Advertisement. Ad-vertisement. nn |