OCR Text |
Show fj THK FACTS IN THE CASE. "1? In our last issue wo stated that there jjkl was a question raised between thoShcr- t ffl lit nd City Marshall as to whose duty . fi it was to care for the remains of Mr. ij O. A. Anderson. K Our neighbor says our lemarks were i utterly lalse fiom beginning to end, 3t but In the next sentenco states that H thooillcers went together and sought , HS. Attorney Maughan and he stated It M was his oplnoii that the Sherllf should III look after the body etc. If there was l no question raised as to whoso duty it was w hy did they ask advice from S Maughan? I The facts are Just aio we stated. !?' There was a question lalsed between iSi the oltlcers, and Marshall Cioclrctt not jll withstanding he did not feel It was 1 his duty to do so, had tho body talc - lip en to the undertakers and did all he mmt could to have It pioperly caicd for. As Wh to notifying the family D. C. Rudgo Hmj; l and Robeit Mudock sent a messenger i Bw l'ariul,se where lie arrived at 3 o'clock a.m. and found Mrs. Anderson Vk sitting up, witli tho tablo spicad, and f the lantcin lighted, waiting for her 14 husband. ft Tlio fact that wo have any ads. at JH all Is about what is worringour neigh- VA bor. -- ' & 'dHHHHHBHB a " mgt,iV )mntniMitrtraf.vtiBiiji. |