| OCR Text |
Show l 1 1 Toliiical tftermath. Hi? 1 Ml I B Ml f FISHER AND JOHN. H 1 i tl Bill HIN'i I ' Tl10 relatIvo public-opinion of Hon. Fisher Har-Bi Har-Bi I ill if , ris and Hon. John Crltchlow, as judged by the H;j ' votes received is a matter of much discussion be H h I tween the gentlemen named. The former asserts Hi a with much emphasis that 'while on its face the H if a I standing of the latter is not bad, it is well that B f fill, 1 tlie Bamberger Coal Company had no expert to B, v iUl 8 examine how many times during the past month a Hh ' jm I new rule was adopted and a long ton of coal was flJLiiUH I delivered where formerly the customer was thank-Hip thank-Hip IF'PI I ful for 1,800 pounds. On the other hand, the coal H' S 'll j5 J agent takes aesthotic grounds and points out how H I I 'i I 1 the sraco of his figure and that natural acting m. ' f I which is true art, displayed in the role of Little K'; Eva in the Tom Cabin performance entirely ob-K ob-K i , literated the memory of the success of his rival H ! it ll j as a dry nurse a few years ago, and gave him a t , I1, i I walk over. j. j f ! Then begins a comparison of the relative in- If ff j tellectual status of the two, but this cannot be h i reported, because the audience at once put their ii !'. j fingers in their ears. It is worse still when the f lltl 3 discussion assumes something like a debate over f j jV p j the respective moral status of the two, for the M '' ' I the audience leaves in a panic. ' I j The only real comfort left for the Honorable g J Fisher is that he knows more good men than his !u rival does, and all these voted for his rival and , I neglected him. But after the hottest kind of a gl discussion they are wont to make up and to agree that the people who really got the worst of it if are those who threw off on two good men and iHH SFiiiul voted for them both. lh ill |
