Show FROM W CAILY SEPT 19 1888 first district court business before judge judd at F apro to vo yesterday david Wl lliams vs david J williams co defendants demurrer confessed seven days given to file an amended complaint ange angeline 1 ine taylor vs Hyrum J taylor order overruling demurrer twenty days allowed to me die answer W D myers vs va C at boley dismissed at pl plaintiffs cost people vs otto hudson and cornelias Sore ngon appeal dismissed united states vs J P it johnson Job unlawful cohabitation plea ot not HOT guilty chang d to guilty sentence set tor for october 9 united states vs elijah elijab burns unlawful cohabitation defendant arraigned and took the statutory time to plead untied united states state s vs charles awkins H unlawful cohabitation defendant entered a plea of guilty sentence se set t for october IS n people vs bub bab williams aphea dismissed andrew lindsey was admitted to citizenship otteline Ott emine frandsen vs va lars franden sen demurrer overruled C C christensen vs P C Burri burrison sou et at al dismissed at ost oost of plaintiff tried to fand out whether tine sue was married mared ri ed or not mrs elizabeth te testified stifled I 1 know mr irving irvcng kno know his bis wi wives ves elizabeth and annette before I 1 in moved eyed to salt bait lake I 1 used to live near him that was six years ago ag go h he married hidi hid third wife in 1851 1881 he be treated all three us his wives to mr hoffman iwas H B cran dalls wife I 1 heard mrs irving talk about Alia ettes child beard h her r say it was tte ft e defendants child itsek 1 used to be friendly to the irving I 1 heard beard that the defendant married a wife in 1831 1881 do not know anything of it myself I 1 have talked with deputy franks scout being a witness in the case this was a week ago the prosecution rested its ito case c and recess was taken till 2 p m this after afternoon hoon the defendant john irving irvina was called and te testified stilled I 1 am acquainted witti with mrs crandall who calls herself mrs Sw inberg I 1 last saw her seven or eight years ago never saw caw her at my iny house bouse since then in june 1886 1 was before commissioner mckay july ad I 1 went off to my sheep camp and returned home on the ol of december 1880 1886 remained a we week a k and then went off and was away till the last of august I 1 have havoc not been at home a month almonth lor for the lasi three years to mr peters I 1 was at home but a a few days at the time I 1 was before the commissioner have not seen mrs Swin Serg or mrs crandall as 1 I knew her for seven years yeara it is 18 or 20 years since she removed from close to where I 1 live I 1 bought her place and she removed to the other side ol of the river I 1 dont know when she left tue me lauer latter place I 1 kno wAnnette Ie levoir voir mr hoffman objected as it was not cross croas examination court wont make any difference witness coati continuing n u ing annette revoir is my wife she lives at my house ann revoir Revo iria Is also my wife she has one child mr peters whose child is it mr hc ff nan aau objected to the qu question es as incompetent objection overruled mr irving I decline to answer to mr from frem jan jaa I 1 to june juneia W 1884 or orsi sibe iye I 1 have not lived with more than one wife have not during that time or with annette or ann revoir as my wife my girat wife is elizabeth W L L pickard tc stifled I 1 know the defendant he is in the sheep business bus ness a portion he be was at his sheep camp be came in to my warehouse with wool in june and then went way for several months judith revoir tes tc stilled titled iu iii mr revoir was at his bis sheep camp he came houi in the winter and stayed two or thieu days he has been home but little the evidence was closed with this witness and mr petard and mr hoffman made brief arguments 10 the jury who returned a ve verdict adlet of guilty I 1 on oa motion n of mr ir 11 petera eters vie the charge ot adultery against edward davis davig was ws it being included in the un lawful charge this closed all of the unlawful cohabitation cased on the trial calendar and such euch others as may oe be set wilt will be in cases where the d bave not yet been arraigned or anure indictments have not yet been report |