| Show DAYS r EPIGRAMS M I m rt o t I There is a Unity of Purpose and andA andI I A Unity of End in the te t e Scriptures s sAS i I AS TO EDUCATIONAL ETHICS That rIt for of Sol SolA oh A 4 0 O The final lons of oC the th twenty fourth annual m of nt th tm Presby b terlan T sire are hold 44 today todar In the t hp l of tho the Halt Ht IkA ColI C Kl t Institute Till opening devotional was wu RI 11 hd Md by b Hev Murphy ot of American m rIcAn York KorV an Prof Prot T 1 F Pay Day Da of ot the San sem Hm seminary inary R IlIve V hl his on HIMe Thin was wa II pre prefaced prefaced faced by b a li o 01 questions from the and answers from the speak speaker er tr The Fhe latter hitter Included sueh euch rama U sentiments AH aR follow You cant Interpret on a 1 naturalistic or basis baM Th The The divine the feu U was wa In the life Be of ot Jama It flowers Slow r out In the lit life lite of ot Christ God worK out mit HI Ideas through the tho Jew JewIsh Jewl Ish Ih l h nation It eo tr m mental effort to follow out the historical hJ lorl method r Is le unity unit of purpose of pf C end and In the Scriptures In lii a 4 Dc In Sn oath each part par that draws till nil together lna a ous oU whole The Bible In Ic 1 th the tAt product of ot ofu u n l life It 11 is L I Uio the outgrow 1 of pf a spirit spiritual ual ial The New ew Testament Is la the tho outgrowth nl o of ot Israels rel life lite Thu rh Ch living not a II manufactured book bookAS AS TO CY The Tho lecturer oi then th look t k up p the main theme of ot the day Ift 1111 TIIt Tho Interpretation of ot nen ho took occasion to 10 eay ea 8 that thet It ae hI h to trout treat of ot hi h hiP themes them c i rather destructively and If It he hs at ut any an limb jed the itt latt method It was va be because because cause cau It was as ls Its ultimate purpose to build up tip new He Ii Jl called to nut Hol Hollers lers lere ler definition d of t rr as u history written beforehand Owl Imparting to His 1115 Ili servants ages ge before It happened The Th Th i t r held this tide Interpretation of th M Old Testament raise rales more difficulties than Ihan It can ran mH meM and that God GI Kan A supreme re regard reo regard gard for the VOW OW ov hwy h l Interested In JI JT every form tonn arm n am phase of ot u Israels life 1 Prophecy Pro ph M from from nn All etymological standpoint In I not before beforehand hand but rather In behalf of ot A prophet Is one ono who speaks for tor another a messenger a preacher a 1 spokesman Prophecy Is that which p puk aks for tor Gg I Tho Tha books hooks of ot prophecy are re hued filled with of ot Hi th men mim of ot God Rod they catered to present wed neede ne b Th Thu object of CIt the prophet Is JI to preach for forthe forthe the ih RK age In which he lived he must meet the of or his own times mice God raised up prophets to m mt meet t th the needs of ot tho growing o MiaMi Is a amodel amodel i imodel model ot I viNO The Tile lecturer I sold no h ever dyer er I formulated f an Interpretation Of f In Inspiration Inspiration the held to the theIn Inspiration In of the Scripture through Individual It U means a ii retain tine divine lit at t work in ift the soul of holy hol men and th the writers were ero Inspired III l the It ItIs ItI Is II I a divine superintending activity on the part of ot Jehovah that thet the BIllie Bible the purpose for which It was WA written via viz t A FL religious a spiritual The great Brest I d according to the ape age lI e in which they t ht lived If It they spoke Ok of ot the future they spoke from material right sit lit t hand hind Their ft Zet the ent ul l though their speech my mi I I Vt been In Inthe Inthe inthe the future at as a case cue of ot Amos Alno me It U was wat at the function of o fie tle t prophets to give comfort to people l i tOd JI of it they tUI spoke for tor the edification edl catlon of ot their people MESSIANIC Dr Days Idea h on prophecy ecy It ee occasioned deep Interest l He Ile held tit that the tendency of ot modern thought was to place a too strict or literal in Int t on thU clasi ciau of prophecy rl th the utterances of Isaiah and Ud that tUt the prophet l did dW not hot look lookdown lookdown lookdown down th the long vista stats It and s see e In th their r th the exact eat date dale datI and Id circumstance of e the coming of Crl M a the l helps wrongly put It but lut saw IU a u ii It II wait w you only Just Juat over the te line In of ot their own 8 times time tm each Mch king kina approach Ins tg i M ie lunk on on who would oud deity t dl Is M 1 that thit In Iq b one A aie ns each ec tied d kin king nf of le Israel III would be bel b be l r ld led l as a e Prophets dM dl not n deal el in II late lf Christ Chrt was w the last Iut lt of At o the God Hod was UI Incarnated naiad ne In Christ Ch a I of ot lh the divine und and Mid the human hUIan aM and the mysterious rious r union un Of oe the two became 1 an ar In Indivisible indivisible divisible personality I AS A TO MY IT nI ME MEIn In hU bl ht previous lecture tUN i ruf If Day Dy something of ot a 1 In re I I to the tw th tr tit ht t I know inow that my m I Jeme in illustration of at o the Ihl i I IMo ho anti and in the thene ne ty l Of ot Interpreting In III the ti light of ot Hs k 11 witter without the t I Importation of extraneous Ideas Id Th Tb speaker Il held that fht etch each be I by y f Its It ii historical environment IU rather r thin than I in the light I ht of th I hI present dav d du as La Lathe the writers writer rl could by no nu I 1 bi I had hav h hadren wen ren n or trout from o nur ir present nt lanI This Thu aroused ar c MM opposition as a It I save ga t the be t bell ll that the le tur r us u drift lag lac into Inlo lbs lines IM of the th s aal alM higher higer crUCI and M n a fireworks firework display of 4 e t were r at t the speak speaker P er r h tm the lb endeavor to tl shaw h that lag IHK I the th and standards of ot prevent ren literary It ear wet It t available bf for r 1111 Mi of m Tn inv I W I nd e T i ihie SIOM 10 his hie Il although li hOlb he hf found foh It I neres nw wry Mry tr to a demand Omand tt that hat he t b h alto Ilk d to 4 his hi position without obstruction tl A 4 caha followed this and An In 1 Day Dy said uld Now Kow No brethren D I J have had hd my m I sa n and some of If yoa hare hais he had yf fUU ur ut lt a around round of ff Kl ELI l c AT Ti I N NAl Ah Ir lb H ti i rUI bi Invitation State stat Sept pt A AC V C laen follow rIM cd Prof Prot tay with Ith a aI I n Ihl It I wa w U Ua a he bf had hd re rd d before and ind re rt related tt rather to 10 xh o work o hal Tut u h ho hr it R would uld lie he of on en I this m M I Pr f X N XI K I n rf r rt f th Ih h b t tf e n ih th 1111 th MiJ It id ih h i j i a ii pI I nf r I H ti 1 a it 1 i m th Pr her in n the th rail part rat they had haf taken In h he u of f education It ii S flab llah t tah tahI In tn I up I hI Iii il the tl th thi i kr at th tI i i j I lull tun lulli tuni lunI I i 1 i 1 TI 1 a r 1 i hr ril Th The Tf ilij f t Li rim v I rif r th I mere mer r f T i if im imi wt bt the K of th tI ar art rt of liIng in hi 11 mutual helpfulness how h t tl to 1111 n fur Independent of or the thi U an hw h t I tn ane t lifes i iut nulles ut ne r vt u nf ti th the rt hl of ot others 1 I I true hl nn ori culture Ih tem tm muM mut mu ee te 4 to 10 it that noble and I tha an nd ideals l ral ure re I J 1 Th referred to the he I rela rI h ions Ion of the different 11 i in II the 11 ih community In school muter the th through the public school of 01 ft I and successful idea Ide The Thu utilitarian and ald tn ti are ar often identical and their mutual I and Interdependence nce should b be made madu Plain In public The Th value Iu of tf the utilitarian was Wil ae Illustrated by bythe h the achievements of ot American civil ch I engineers In J South Routh Africa and In II other othet foreign forel n countries Our system of ot edu education ru edUcation cation caton U Is It of such uch an high standard that an commission not tt long bug Ion came eme over Or here lucre to study Its It tea fea features te lures tures with wih a 8 I view to adopting for tor home hOle consumption such of ot them Ih as 5 com commended cm mended d themselves ht Prof Nelson de referring to th ti the public schools a Op Immoral because not fbi In III II strict re ac accordance with Ith the personal opinion of ot critics critic and Mid be lie had hid shown one on county superintendent that the lit 1st tr claim that the public school hol were wre lf unmoral immoral was U merely m lly beRIe he the hl children were not taught tu bt his Il peculiar Ideas 1 al on religion nl 1 INSTRUCTION The speaker railed for a steady t im improvement provement in II the tle quantity and an quality quam of ot public Instruct ton whereby the i youth are Ir nl inure courageous and ander self er reliant Too To many rl re it ro I go so and where wh a achild achild child Is II a Mowed Ilot to go 0 this way a he ha he be herome j i rome counts adla and weak In charac character chaa ter We Ve WI mutt mut have hav more ln thorough I work and here hero the speaker called ailed Ile at attention t i I 1 to the tb need nH of ot capable con ceu conscientious c I teachers and an to t the Ideal Idel teacher he hI phd paid a Blowing tribute I ing In a strong point of or the most moat desirable form torm of personality In concluding he hC h I Ild said ld wr wi WI must mut help hell each ech to torl rl above ahoe the preceding one and labor lr to make mik our lives a blessing in this world orld Miss IIse 1 Denote Thompson concluded the morning with wih the imi l hen h drill di and I In the tb afternoon Prof Day DI concluded his bile hi lectures on Personal Work ork and If A H t Martin of lt Mantl danti sooke on fn The Mission 11 lon School In Utah I |
