Show FRONT OF PINGREE I BANK Will NOT BE TORN DOWN State Supreme Court Cour Decides De Dc- Case Involving I De-I Millions Million of Dollars A I A question that Involved 1 millions million of or dollars worth of property not property not only In Og cn but In Salt Ial Lake HS e was I settled h by the tho state supreme court coart I yesterday when that body reversed tI I Ithe the district courts court's decision in the j I case of or John S S. S Lev iH against I James i Pingree and nd the Pin Pingree National I Bank Bonk of or Ogden The court holds holds that it will wl not he be necessary tot foi Pingree Pin Pin- greo gree reo to tear teRl out the front of DC the han ban 1 I In order to make It 11 flush with the I sidewalk line Had the supreme court sustained the Judgment of ot the lower court owner owners owners own own- I ers er of property In Ogden and Sail Salt Lal Lake e where in many Instances large i buildings have havo their frontages ex extending extending ex- ex tending bp beyond ond the sidewalk line unc would have been forced to remove thorn them This w would uld have meant the I expenditure of millions local financiers finan finan- I ciers conservatively estimate and the destruction of oC man many artistic I fron fronts t I IThe The Pingree bank is conceded b by many to to be the most artistic bank I architecturally In the state The front Is massive with huge hugo monolithic mono mono- pillars The objection raised I Ii i was that this front extends several I II I feet teet the r regular sular Inner sidewalk side- side I walk line linc Mr l Pingree estimated that had the lower courts court's decision de against arnin t him I been sustained it would have cost at If least st to set sel tho the front back Mr r. r Lewis plaintiff in the case is I proprietor of a Jewelry Jewell store next to the bank ank He claimed it was a 1 menace to his business s1 and asked I damages in a addition to an order of of condemnation As far tar as the tho business busi- busi ness nels men of ot the Junction City were I concerned opinion seemed to be bc about j i equally divided l Many Ian swore that lint I such a bank banle would benefit business j in any locality Others declared Just Justas I as us that It con constituted l a I damage to neighboring institutions Many of at Salt Lakes Lake's banks and other large business structures l vio- vio j Jato Into the same property rights and for tor that reason the outcome was watched I with especial interest here I I All Mi three court Justices j a agreed on the decision They held t that had hadan injunction suit stilt been een se secured secured se- se cure cured when construction work was wag I first bt begun gun such a case might have I favored orNI the plaintiff but hut now no that I tho the structure has been heen completed no notion lotion can CUlt he be taken |