| Show DECISION IN TilE THE KENTUCKY CASE CASEI I Judge Tal Taft lols Holds that the lie Federal Court fas No Jurisdiction In inthe 1 the State Officers in State Slate Courts 1 Feb 11 that the feer federal court has no jurIsdiction In th the contests In Jull Judge taft title afternoon to grant the cation Uon for tor against to the Ken Kentuck tuck State bor board Of elections ad and the nm contestants for tor StAte G of flees other than lien r an and leuten ant governor Ju Judge ge Tf Taft finIshed reading his hll epin Ion at m in In whIch h lie denIed th the applIcatIon for injunctions In both Of aae In the Kentucky hll After citing the la laws s showing that the feder at court had n no jurisdiction In lah such cape he reviewed the G bf elton election law as the most mOlt Infamous statute that had ever cona before the attention of ofa n a ourt court and nl also o In vigorous terms term a the that hut have bae existed In and that tha t are cie cited In the bi bill of facts But he e held that It was I morel merely a mat mattro rot Jaw law the court I I I the outrages that Ir are allf alleged In the undisputed te statement Of f ft Use tarts ot of th the Thins t alt Immense cW crowd In th bIte feel federal I tar awaiting the decision of oC the aur court Louisville K l Feb e HGo r tok took tl the InItiative thA this anti liR hiss had rrt prepared an application fr Cr An Injunction against J 3 l C W tV r rand and John D 11 lie Be t fp enjoin t the ne firt fiNt named from t to tte Ihl dutie duties of at governor Ct of k and the second defendant t fr rota u as Ut oral ral TaylOr sues lupe I as An individual arid u ais I as governor ff of Kentuck attorneys are Helm anti and Druce Bruce B ridge and Shelby W ti 1 Ii Yost W Y Q 0 and A K C The attorneys have not yet ot applied to tobY bY 51 of the cIrcuIt judges for a tent tem restraining order oner t K ICy Fel Fi ITe J ton ion sit suit vs s Taylor aI r b by which the Democrats sue to ouSt Taylor corn POssession of the governorship W was el tiled at 11 p m tl |
