OCR Text |
Show ;no cause of action." 1too, Jan. 22. The J.;ry In the !5.000 dumage suit ot Mrs. Annenn jreeuwoed against tho S. P., L. A. A 1. L. Railroad company, In thb Fourth Jlstrlct Court, brought In a verdict or thu defoiidnnt, "No cuuao or action," ac-tion," yesterday. It took sevorul days ta hear the caoo. Plaintiff alleged thr.t on August S, 1912, while she and ninny other persons wore waiting at tho company's lopot ut Auiorlcuii Fork to take un excursion trnln to Salt Lake City, h!io vn3 struck by a projecting portion of tho engine of tho company's train. Five of her ribs were fructurod and she sustained other Injuries, some of which are permanent. The, compla''it alleged negligence on the pnrt of de-fondant de-fondant tor fnlluro to maintain a nil ut tho Bide of tho track for the nro of pnbt Hirers, for running ?he jt n greater rato of speed tl..tn la permitted by tho American F rk city ordinance and for failure o rills' a bell. The defcuso denied the nilepitloua or tho complaint and chnrged contributory contrib-utory negligence on tho part or plaintiff. |