OCR Text |
Show JUDGE RITCHIE DENIES BECK'S QUASH MOTI Following the rule laid down gHfcfc ihc Supreme Court in the case of LBi vs. Ivcrs, wherein it was hold thaLE. court cannot go behind an abatmetPv judgment, on a mere motion, JwHfel Jtitchic rendered a far-roaqlihijjiifjfctoj cision Friday in the case of !LHi Beck et al. vs. C. E. Laync ''K? Layne resides in Ogden, nutl iBPf.! time ago Beck et al. secured a jHpku incut against him at Murray thrnjjEa-I thrnjjEa-I Luke's collection agency. Later,;'K', abstract of judgment was tiled Tn'.Kn Third District court, and an 'cxeciJkSc was issued nnd forwarded to OgileH, Layne then appeared in court ijHTi)! moved that the oxecution be, quan111" upou the ground that iho juSofV9 was illegally rendered against hiHru; Judge ltitchie, however, denied t'ae'lHt |