Show Court Notes The K000 damage suit of Sarah Pier son et al vs the Salt Lake Rapid Transit Tran-sit company occupied the attention of Judge Morse and a Jury again yesterday yester-day but was not concluded E J Wilkinson trustee In bankruptcy bankrupt-cy for the Star Grocery company baa led an action against the Anderson Taylor company to collect 38371 which It Is alleged the defendant compelled the grocery company to pay It three l days before the bankruptcy proceedings were Instituted and at n time when the grocery company was Insolvent I I IB alto alleged that the payments were made as a result of threats on the part of the defendant to begin attachment I proceedings I The Utah National bank has begun suit agaInst F E Houghton et al to I collect 27010 and Intereston a promissory promis-sory note The bank Is also suing John I R Foulks et aK to collect 250 on an assigned I as-signed promlssory note Judge Hal devoted his attention I again yesterday to the hearing of testi mony In the len case of the Utah burn ber company vs W F James The hearing was not concluded however and will be resumed on Monday morning morn-ing next ThC first annual account of the executors ex-ecutors of the estate of J R Walker I deceased waT approved by Judge Halt I jortTday The m count shows the 10 i j lyf I f of 57SSC750 for the year and Us j I uitcnients of SC16SI2S leaving a balance bal-ance of 1717031 on hand o The Supreme court handed down nn opinion yesterday affirming the Judgment 1 Judg-ment of the lower court < In the case of Frank Thompson vs S Hays appellant l appel-lant In so doing the court remarks that the record IE I fatally defective in 0 that It docs not sot forth that u motion for a new trial was made In the lower court and does not set forth the grounds upon which the motion would be or was made This the Court adds leaves nothing to consider < but the judgment judg-ment roll which states certain excel ions without stating that the findings and conclusions of law were erroneous leaving the Supreme court nothing to do but to affirm the Judgment The I opinion is written by District Judge Tlolapp and Justices BaskIn and Bartch concur The action was brought I In the lower court to quiet the title to t certain water and the plaintiff prevailed pre-vailed I |