Show if NINE MEN NOW t I ON THE JURY I ISM r rin 1 T 1 I in Mort Case Casl KNOWS LITTLE OF MUR MURDER R 1 t WD u CD sTACLE 10 T OYT 1 tile bU bUI tifT hi HE cott II 1 T I Judge T a aJer John b by ident of aM aDd a Q ft Jer a Ht ja is well WU qumi juror He has k led ed a a the ell caN cae caNa I melv raJ one pa paper 1 a n subjeCt mace laSt No Mo Nober th of ng hal baI spent p ber Wet We t hol line out In tile th bis with his hie p aDd aM conic II is flee of 11 k the tilt t or o Id 11 1 jr H B Stewart Steart for far a ai ag orni kM t at n to 10 nU OUSt t tb Juror i g time he h receive an tur J KlIper the Sharp revelation that be b ver MOXIe Ko e held that rd of it t auA Judie iud ord that r aS the juror DOt re ic r f 01 red tO 0 Ii fJ it il was drawn ont oat of ci Iia that hard the thC abject referred to tot had hai It h Ourt rO during duriac the r f t t be belr bev fh Do you JOU nOL Mr lr harp bad hd tM the revelation v and Alexander IID an then a at i rd U it tile the ad i rth F tt j h him a splendid I Only One lurer t D were th durt during the day 11 I as the o only y one ODe who d Neither iI ide e cx a Challenge and the was wac void of oC Incident led for tor an torney Stewart I C Lambert the thet tr t I get manufacturer out oat ft dt tile the box boxi to t i i u finally when Mr Lam lamU Lamn I U n l to give gin a yell yea or 01 no DO an aner er t the t he usual DD be be h 1 Mr 11 arp believed it and aDd that thai h tw had hd 0 N ef ill In Ine e was at aa Deal ner a an 1 3 tilt could get eel Judge Judie I 1 rutting t weary of the jury n altitude tile the chege thle Mr Ir Lambert parlier tt thet he be bed hed d IIlo talking of the as he het t ht he would be called as juror JurOf Ht 1 had reserved l his s judg 1 nt Dt for Or the same reason He Be had bad ml aw sort lort of an opt however del and thought possibly It would take taketo to remove the same me Thin ri UI Mr stewart but Mr lr would ot eliminate it from tile the h tree different times ue the aged but only su ly OR on the of revelation Par lioL ravid Daid R Lyon O one of jaron ex cx d for implied bias wu was of et the a 1 that he would give a tr If trial although he be w an l d of James R Hay and often u as CIa cited tEd with It h him and so ao 1 illy up to the time of the tragedy tedy i e court ourt tho thought ht It better that Mr J von 01 hould not erve cerve lance barles A Harper had bad not DOt expressed d dJ J i opinion because of the pro probability tt at hE would be summoned as an a sed HI H had read aU all about the these se but hAt haj no DO Jie Be did c cen ot oten en fancy the defendant guilty aT any or than any other man The tales laD sn was 8 excused by an agreement ha Hn een the state and the defense He Be BeU U 5 one ODe of several excused during the they y under Attorney Horne Stewart Semuel S toD what paper he had rend eon ruing raiD the ease case The he be replied Then you read some pretty ones ories t you O oh J I dont know The IM i J right i Barnell passed mater muMei on an all oth ea subjects but would not give a at rt t answer q as to his belief Ia 1 the harp revelation One Gate Juror a Day Three Jurors juron are re yet Jet to be selected ld 4 tt It Is 15 of course a matter of n u as to whether say or aU all of them 11 be lE this week One ODe Jerse Jersey day y has baa been the average to date te nlrb Ieh is considered fali p ing ering the great notoriety lift given bo boBoth Both a are anxious however howeS g get l Started on the evidence ThE tie following Were for bias Charles L E Shop e R D Myron tr Robert W Palmer David Lyon Jo fe h L 0 8 W T Belief B Al AlS S hares harles A 0 Harper iL S Sl iton William A E P F Frt l n Charles harlen J 1 ld Al rt E raby Braby Ut Parsons WU Wit WUn n A t I owan aea C Lambert R Horne Home S 8 T P Lake E EAm bbs homas homa It Ellerbeck John JohnJohn Am 1 JOhn George W A Y Palm jI Pia So ards W aId A Sta Staples Hairy HeDI H John T Jass N If J A Goodhew 1 L T Buckle Bucklee e H Jon John CoI Connelly Reri Rea S 11 A Wt Wright |