Show FIVE MILLIONS I FOR IN Judgment Against Asphalt Trust Confirmed in inV Venezuela V Caracas Venezuela March 12 1 via 10 Willems tad March arch 14 The superior court today handed band d down a av verdict v confirming the Judgment of the iwer ower r court which condemned the New NewYork NewYork NewYork York Bermudez B Asphalt company compan to pay a fine of to the Venezuelan government nt for having extended assist assistance assistance ance nce to the thO th revolution which was direct directed ed d against President Castro This sum sums Is s the estimated cost of at putting down the he revolution The Th company c inpan will trill appeal V to the court courtot of ot cassation V The finding of or the lower court re referred erred d to in the above ab Ve dispatch which ts Is s the ciVil court of or first Instance was landed handed down in August of ot last l st year yearTh Th Tile he appeal appe l to the court of ot cassation is isnow Isnow isnow now the thO th only thing that th t remains to the far tar a the situation tiOn In fn Ven Venezuela la is concerned c Proved In United States Courts It was from American witnesses and from rom testimony taken before judges in the United States courts that the he Venezuelan government obtained Its most important proof of at the part al all a eged ged l to have been played pl by y the as asphalt asphalt hait company con pany V iri hi the Matos Maos revolution revolution revolution tion the furnishing of ot the money with which to start the fight The Th controversy between n the asphalt company and the Venezuelan govern government government government ment has been long and bitter and was wasn In n a critical state at the time that Her Herbert Herbert bert jert W Bowen Boren was American minister at Caracas C r cas On this occasion the state department sent what was practically any an ultimatum to Venezuela in regard to the matter The Tho charge that the company aided the revolution rev with funds has been sub substantiated substantiated officials of ot the company hav hay having havIng ing lag testified to the truth of this state statement statement statement ment In New York In 1905 p |