Show ARGUMENTS CONCLUDED I Rickctts and Doimclluu i > the Cen I tcimlalEnrelJn Mine The arguments in the case of J M 1 Rlcketts and John T Donnellan vs The i Centennial Eureka Mining company were concluded before Judge King last evening sitting in the supreme courtroom court-room as judge t > f the First district court The suit was brought to recover re-cover 10000 the value of ores alleged ito have been extracted from the Bangor claim owned by the plaintiffs and adjoining ad-joining the Centennial Eureka The hearing was on application of the plaintiffs plain-tiffs for an order permitting them to make an underground survey of the workings of the Centennial Eurelta or the purpose of discovering how far the defendants had encroached on the Bangor Ban-gor property The defendants resisted the order being be-ing made alleging that it was not applied ap-plied for on good faith and that the object of it was to find out from the I ological structure in what direction and to what depth the ore body of the Centennial ran for the guidance of the plaintiffs in sinking a shaft so that they might strike the Centennial vein The defendants denied havIng encroached en-croached on the Bangor claim or having hav-ing taken any ore therefrom Messes Kawlins cc Critchlow and Brown Henderson were the attorneys for the plaintiffs and Messrs Bennett Marshall Brady appeared for the defendants de-fendants When the arguments concluded his honor took the matter under advisement ad-visement until 945 oclock this morning morn-ing |