| Show VANCES APPEAL H WILL DE BE HEARD Supreme Court Docket Is Out and includes Important ir Cases The docket for tho October term of the j supreme court is out and shows cases eases to be tried between OcL Oct 11 U nand and Nov 1 Inclusive Thomas Vances appeal from tho the Third district court where he was found guilty gun gunot J of ot murder In the first degree and sen sentenced to be hanged 1 is 18 the capital caco ca The appeal stay stays the execution un until until til tI his application for a new trial has hlis hasben ben been decided Vance was convicted of poisoning his wife The TAe docket shows the following cases o Ot kt t 11 State appellant vs VB Joseph Barker state vs VB Webster Green appel appellant I Lint lant lanto LintOt o Ot Od tOd t t 18 State In relation to Joseph Jo eph Brandl appellant vs VB v Silver Buyer King Icing I Ing Con Consolidated Consolidated Mining Alining company and others ate vs Henry H Blake appellant state stat VS VB Elizabeth EUzabeth Moore appellant Out Oit 13 George C Whitmore appellant appellants s run Fuel company and the D R B RG RG BG II G Railway company compan Joseph H lL Roberts and others appellants vs va Tuttle Bros Broe William Brown jr appellant vs Wll WU 1 am T Owen opt et 14 William II H Pool appellant vs I County Light Power company ad in others F A Neuberger vs David Robbins Bobbins Co appellants W tV V S Me Mc Met t irmok vs Marie Levy appellant tt It t 15 George W V Moyer vs James I appellant J W Cromeenes vs Sin San Pedro Los Angeles Angel Salt Lake Jak LakeR r R inay company com appellant E P Fer Ferr l er err r by bv W V M and E B S Ferry Perry general generalL L b 11 vs S R B E Fowler appellant 0 ut ot t 18 Joseph T Young appellant vs VB Liia LI i a Hyland Dennis Fee Feb F vs VI v National Pik Prk of the Republic appellant Salt SaltI I Ike ike City vs H L Howey Howe appellant ot Oct 1 N G Howards and J L Gib s Jn r appellants vs X N J Meagher and andt t Dry Gulch Irrigation company and John appellant vs VB C CL L LRoy LiRy Ro Anderson administrator of or estate o C r t l L Anderson John McCullough ap apI I mt vs William imam McCullough admin tor Oi kt t 20 Charles Tyng vs National Bank t t tu te if Republic and the Constant Lor LorI LorT T y in n Investment company appellants norge G 3 urge irge J Gibson vs Frank E i i Id d others appellants Thomas Tadd vs I t 8 P L I A S L Railway company c D i llant ci ht t 21 ilA A O 0 Smith Jr v vs H G GC C uk and others oth rs and D Barry Darry appel P J 1 H Arnold appellant vs Rich RichA Li d A Pope sheriff James Gibson GU appel 7 1 Int nt i t vs s George G Doyle Plumbing com corn ol ot q V 22 Catherine E LeVine Lt and oth f r appellants vs YB J 1 W V Whitehouse and I irs m Ott OU t S Grow appellant vs Utah T w it t Railway Beltway company compan Israel Hun f lpt appellant vs VIiI Adolph Harris i n hr t K L H Erickson on vs Moron Moroni C appellant Michael Pulos vs D DR DB R n G appellant C E Murphy vs C appellant t as E Horton appellant vs tJ drs dris Ann R B Gay VB vs Young Coop Mercantile Institution and andA andu A u P I Rockhill appellants Sierra Nevada T J mtr mer company appellants vs John Jonn JohnM JohnlY M lY i and others ort tt 27 TA A V Y Hague vs Juab County Count 31 Mi Ml 1 Elevator company appellants F Pritham ham Livery LIver Transfer company compan vs VII R L D McDonald appellant Neal Charles E Durand Durandt 1 I r n appellant va vs t e of the peace 1 t sj H Kurtz vs VB Ogden Canyon CanyonS S company compan and H D Clarke e f nd t Utah tah A Oregon Lumber pinY n J II H Winslow Jr r and amI the theS I S 5 i n fl Williams Candy company appel appal 1 1 l it if vs 8 C Frank Emery county sher aher sherI iVf Hi tf M I Kimball appellant vs Success I oth othe i d 1 1 Colorado Mining lIning companies and e C Jt t 2 Fred Halvorsen vs David F FV FI I V s ker Iker appellant Joseph JOEph E and andr c rs rg vs s PV F J 1 Hagenbarth appellant r N Nv ID A Smith Smyth vs WI T A Butters others and commissioners toners of Morgan c rt appellants state tate vs Thomas Thoma 1 AH e appellant |
