TRIAL OF BISHOP CALLED OUTRAGE Judge Squelches Cannon Def Defense De- De f nse Sa- Sa Says Sas s Hell He'll M Make ko Own Decisions WASHINGTON V ASHI April 13 UP UP- UP Wrangling between opposing attorneys nc's in the trial of Bishop James Cannon Jr Friday brought the statement that the proceedings were an outrage ge Justice Peyton Gordon ended the argument abruptly by telling Defense Defense De- De Attorney Robert H. H McNeill that the court would decide what constituted an outrage If an any The contro controversy e sy started in cross cross- Lee P. P Oliver special special cial agent o of the department of justice jus- jus Uce tice who testified about a conference conference confer confer- ence between Bishop Cannon and the district attorn attorney y in 1031 McNeill charged that Olivers Oliver's tes- tes testimony timon had b been en led lcd b by the prosecution prosecution tion and that he had not told the whole truth about Cannons Cannon's cash transactions in his 1928 1923 campaign against Alfred E Smith When Justice Gordon overruled McNeill's objection the latter exclaimed exclaimed ex- ex claimed I think it is nn an outrage I am going to protect the rights of my client even if the heavens fall You will get your rights and the thc heavens arc not going to fall retorted retorted re- re the justice And I would prefer that you did not tell me what makes nn an outrage United States Attorney Leslie LesUe C C. Garnet observed at that point that he was getting tired of the injured attitude of the defense and McNeill McNeill Mc- Mc Neill apologized to the court Then the proceedings continued