Show NAVAL unreasonable HOPE FOR AGREEMENT ON LIM OF SUBMARINE AS INE TON NAGE IS ABONO american w can compromise proposal finan and Complot ly rejected by the french CIg delegation tm wad washington n g R hope pe fare for nn agreement to limit aub submarine maMne tonnage was waa de blared cia red to hem have hem been abandoned wednesday at uie th meeting ot of the arms conference gatial committee th the demand by france tor for a ml mini mum submarine oman tonnage of tons time aiu declared by delegates to have closed the time door to any agreement t the he american compromise proposal having b been m roje rejected cited finuala finally me and completely et b hy the french aside aid th the possibility of bar ionizing mon king izing elewa I 1 on na submarine I 1 a tonnage th tha american delegation n la raught brought fo forth b a new near proposal Ozo posed to gualt the size mae of and ad other lia auxiliary larry craft at to an A maximum wat ional of tors tons the tha presentation of the french viewpoint hand based on an calculations of her novel naval expert and robt reinforced forred by approval of the french cabinet meet ing I 1 in paris was followed by lengthy the committee mitt lali adjourning rid 9 the anci flout rate after two houra otter after ar dg had bad boea been media madia to meet act again a at 3 p m albert hainaut sarraut Sar Sai raut bond bead of the french dla delegation satio ft was understood tood pre sound dented with an am air of ft lity the declaration me cl th that at france could not mt accept alaa I 1 ess than tons ton of auxiliary tonnage ron nage in addition to a submarine tonnage manage ot of 90 the american anter CAR compromise prop saul would amid be haf given F france mm sl all to tona of guama gub ma T the uri british sh and ad jorame Jop aDeso delegations 1 are am sold said to have hare titled that 1 la arm of the french stand cistand on DO buban fines they may would both feel compe compelled llad to reser main a e a action 0 on on an the tonnage ratio for auxiliary craft allotted great britain led ind japan under the american plan I 1 italian n wk spokesman fol following mg P presan III hit katoa of the french demand and it aam aa said it expressed regret that france friner had bad not no seen its ILK way dent to act accept pt at in mailer alln tonnage and ad JP japan alao 1 through hem bere delegation spokesman it da dared that preach demanda demand to it to same something ing which japan maid could not hot hope to sanction under the american proposal the french dele deletion delegation tion declared land ad liverence lie rence to the calif capital tnt ship ratio denand dem m despite disagreement on sub mob imand ai ariDes it but with it 1 the alam biall al that A she desired to j bugla ala re rebuilding handing re placement 1 in lin 1927 although this out not mean to com that sh all A intended placing them la in the me water before th the replace P 1 IS ment period provided under it cr t tha be cap P ut ital agreement agreed that there was no an hope of I 1 in u 49 agreement beament ou on want total submarine ton toil aage go the committee itam turned med from ft the 4 tion to ta chat of f auel 1 mary lary craft th the proposal I 1 that the A in if t fay any warship other ill than a capital ih alp P or an airplane carrier be limited 0 tons time in to future tire was put pat forward tort fort ward nvard and was wait under I m when ban jie he midday adjournment was A taken the american Americ tui amp itam to nuat limit he ll 11 size of auxiliary craft to tons tone al alao p provides id that such cla teaell 1 I bull not mt entry carrr gima game greater grea t r than eight anches the american delegation it was learned mi ad after the meeting plans piano later ater I 1 to preat tit a proposal dealing w with ith ilip inalee lne carriers probably suggesting 9 limitation 1 of size ize a aa well as number her |