OCR Text |
Show 1 HURSDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1979 THURSDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1979 PLEASANT GROVE REVIEW, PLEASANT GROVE, UTAH City Council are being annexed by Pleasant Grove. . Because of this protest it will be necessary for the matter to be heard by the County Boundary Commis-sion. It was noted that last July when the council was about to take final ac-tion on the Manila annexation, Cedar Hills protested the anexation and a meeting with the boundary commis-sion was held. It was felt by all city officials attending that meeting that little, if anything was accomplished at this meeting and it was adjourned without a decision or taking public comment from those present. It was evi-dent from that meeting that the boundary commission is not sure what the recent legislation would established the commission means. Relating to this first meeting of the boundary commission, Mayor Haynie read a letter form its chairman, Clyde Naylor, which indicated that a conti-nuance of the original meeting has been set for Thursday, October 11th and a decision by the commission will be given at that time. The letter also indicated that no final action on the proposed Manila annexation should be made at this time. Councilman Mills noted that the request for no final ac-tion was the same request as received prior to the July meetings on the mat-ter and that at their subsequent boundary commission meeting the chairman had told the city officials that they should have taken final ac-tion on the matter so that the com-mission could act on the matter. He stated that he feels the boundary commission does not know what they are to do. In conclusion, the council indicated that the city has taken action to an-nex the area but until the protests are heard and the boundary commission makes a decision the annexation pro-cedure is not complete. Concerning the public hearing por-tion of the meeting the council, after a lenghty discussion, voted to approve a zone change to single dwelling fora four block area in the central part of town indicating that the area had become saturated with multiple units and to allow additional units would create a hardship for the area residents. The feelings were express-ed at the meeting by a few of the council members that the single dwelling denotation should be remov-ed from all areas of town and the review of multiple dwellings continue as present with a public hearing at which the neighbors have an oppor-tunity to express their views. Another part of the public hearing was to review the changes to the sub-division ordinance. It was reported that the develop-ment policies adopted about a month ago requires these changes to the subdivision ordinance. The changes having to be made provides for a 10 cash bond for subdivision to provide for immediate resolve of nuisance situations when no action will be taken by the developer, requiring more participation from the developer for utility lines, public facilities, debris basins, pressure reducing stations, etc. and providing for $90.00 per lot fee to pay the cost of the plan review work. Sam Walker, Wes Walker and Don Ellis, local developers were present and expressed concern about the possible broad interpretation of the requirement for public facilities. The council indicated that if any items were felt to be required by a development that special negogiations with the council would be necessary. Sam Walker expressed concern over the $90.00 per lot fee that this was the highest fee in the county for plat review and that the amount seems not to directly relate to the actual cost of the city for the necessary plan reviews. It was reported that the city had done a cost study on the matter and had added the cost of engineering, planning consulation and work done by city personnel and had arrived at the $90 figure. It was felt by the city that any amont less than this figure would result in a subsidy to the developer. Council Mills maintained that the ci-ty must provide that housing developments "pay their way" so that established city residents are not paying for the new developments. It was also stated that the change in development policies recently adopted by the council and the related changes to the subdivision or dinances are intended to provide that the developments carry their share. Asked if development places such a burden on the city why is the city an-nexing additional property, it was explained that with the changes in development policies the developments should not become a financial cost to the city, that the city is presently providing services to the Manila area with little compensatio-- n and by annexation the city will receive payment for the services which are being received and that it is felt that eventually this area will become a part of Pleasant Grove and that the planning being done present-ly by the county does not coincide with the planning of the city nor was it felt to be good planning at all. At the conclusion of the discussion the council voted to approve the amendments to the subdivision or-dinance. ' - Coke, Sprite, Tab Hi-La- nd Keebler Graham Yoplait i6 oi. 8 pock SHERBET CRACKERS yogurt I Jill Ice Cream fffgm I i 39 J 189 J r 1 J 1 7891 I CriscoOil , Miracle loaf " Pacific Friend g 24 oi 97' LrJ Whip 99 Wonder Bread 59 --- -- Mushrooms 395.n I Country Club n 1 lb. doz- - I ffi 1 lb. j Potato Chips 67 h&ul Blue Bonnet 49' -- T Large Eggs 59 Riti Crackers 79 f FRYER ( Lean ( Bonele" Savorv ( Raycorn I BREASTS GROUND BEEF HAI I Jljl 1 7Q $35 f37 J. Xh'i I jy L Sliced 1.47 lb. J J lbJ I ' I Hunting Specials Her J $4 9 5 l5rj ',antern I fftett 1 5 Anniversary C$2695 I IB om r Prestone "- - I BHHH SL fasti MeSBEa flni Antifreeze c 11 Coleman Fuel I prites effective Oct. 11-- 18 AQ Sft59 VISIT OUR NEWLY REMODELED A I A J PR0V0 STORE! W J I ( ''' 1 fCAULIFLOUR) ... f Utah ) MATURE 1 I GRAPEFRUIT APPLES MUSHROOMS I 81 JJtL T3V ifL M.D. OR NORTHERN Western Family Suave TISSUE LEMONADE SHAMPOO TAMPAX I 4 roll pack " I pBL, 79 1 8 s 1J 79 $ 1 65 |