Show I 1 I 1 ble 11 I 1 CHE 1111 n a at tol r 6 ke bile proposes a 3 kill dill for tile lc fin ad k 1 pro lie tiled of frish nien ll 11 tit MID IRISH ly i 04 id it 11 awls lile like a bill to benefit file lie 10 S landlords land bud lorus lords I 1 BE isad a 1 11 1 theme which does dl sot meet a 1 I 1 CUB I 1 B ilk ill the tt Ipp lir ot of the filaci of or r r the irish POOL LO lonon coq march 04 4 in commers commons i t today hlay MaU ia hewa a hon frome B secretary in I 1 I 1 labouchere 1 reply to a question questin by I 1 denied that aspe inspector cor jarvis had ever r into business at DI VA norte colorado I 1 gone Sheri dans ralo railed states near inear ranc betor the purpose of gleaning I 1 to ho placed before tile par I 1 lr 4 I 1 IF nell comilo comroe piou ballo ir in reduced a bill for the in ireland and for 60 0 of land or the he ment of tl ti e po berdia lie act tv the bill also provides for the estilda est ildi ol of aa an irish land de martn bot 1 Uil allour four said in proposing i firm of a 0 lai fat of ile tie artmen t that the cow lex D aturo of the question resented entel itea its if ei e now DOW IQ LQ I 1 jewer ure ewert bau thau 1 n f e bodies for the alua walus ien lien gild od sate ol 01 end tue alt ta proposed the of tl alcee ese into we one boly the question i ought i t ft a and hill bill be c tile he government overn ment answered anBe red mo no compulsory should be used more sparingly ironclad Trot clad irish cheers chee rii rot allea justified by necessity etsity sity it choom ho be ap applied pp lie d compulsion could not tie one ailed if they compel hol landlord andlor Js a to bell sell they must foi boici ci tenant to buy the moat most cogent exigent reason against compulsion was mas that they coul auld of no make mal e the bill compulsory without applying it to the ft hole of reland ireland the g vern ment saw no possibility 01 the romedi ae consummation of acu b an normous tran transaction rather as alie 0 compulsory transfer of the whole land v or r Ireland from the existing owners to 0 the existing occupiers ought th y throw irow any risk upon british taxpayers the government lovern ment an aw aaeree ered no still british credit I 1 under a perfectly secure condition must be used in dulling deiling with the r question of advance advances to tenants to enie able the them i to purchase the govern ment has decided it cried against t advancing more than years rental I 1 balfour Ital tour then went nn on at great length to esplan the tile scheme of facuri IT ty fund the latter being very com in a portion lathe is the ashbourne act improved and ith arditi ins required security toi for purchase etc aft t r an R n elaborate belabor ate f in ancial detail showing how the im im ewul exchequer secured against de janit B if ur said bald it was impossible unless there a acre ere a repetition of the tile famine of 1840 hat that gual ruteen affecting the law aud and education grants should be approached it la is designed to use one fourth per cent tr fr in the tenants annual four per cent nt at as a fund for the erection of rs dwellings dwell inca that a grant of a n and a half from the irish 7 burth surplus should be devot d to relieving destitution indus irie sand ameliorating the condition cf of the poor districts balfur in conclusion conc luion defended the iRbe keeme meas as without risk to abe imperial taxpayer tax payer while 33 0 pound winda a advanced under the bill with pounds under the tile ap A b lr 9 bourne lourne act would establish a per letual emual fund from bibb which future pur I 1 chafes ella pets by tenants might be made gladstone eaid said the scheme is is certainly very cm implicated and thinks thanks ere doe due to balfour hr fr the puns he be 1 bail bad taken in in its preparation tion it was premature be added ail deil to discuss the tile involved proposals of the bill 0 the bi bill passed its first reading rea Jing |