OCR Text |
Show MAKE COMPANY PAVEJQUESI Twenty-fifth Street Resi- dents Petition City to Press Paving Attorneys for property owners of paing district Xo. 131, upper Twenty-fifth Twenty-fifth street this morning submitted S communication to the board of city commissioners protesting against per-I per-I mission being granted to the Utah Hapld Transit company in placing shale along its tracks Instead of pav-lng pav-lng and asking the city to proceed with 'he original plan to pave the dis-I dis-I trlct and along the street car tracks as well. I The communication set forth that In the event the tractfon company refused re-fused to pave It would le tll' duty of I the Cltj to proceed with the paving and to levy the traction company's I portion of expense against the prop-j prop-j ertv of the traction company. I Purthei it was suetff'ted thai if the comjiany then refused to pay the cost the city should have ample remedy rem-edy by bringing clll action against the traction mmpany and could collect 1 either In this manner or selzo the company's1 property. The attorneys declared they could J see no reason why the traction C"in-ipany C"in-ipany should be relieved of its expense I in paving along the tracks, it being I necessary as a public Improvement. I There should be no discrimination, ! the attorneys stated, j The communication asks the city to J proceed in installing the paving and j then take the necessary action to force the traction company to bear Its share of the expense. llalverson and Pratt, attorneys for i the property owners in the district, drafted the, communication .i aotlon was taken upon It by the commissioners commission-ers this morning who ordered the (communication filed. |