OCR Text |
Show DISTRICT COURT PROCEEDINGS The regular November session of the District court, which was somewhat some-what belated on account of the Court being detained so long at Nephi, was begun here on Friday the 7th. The term promised to be one of considerable consider-able length at first, when it came to setting the cases, for trial some of the attorneys were unable to be present, pres-ent, and for other reasons, the majority ma-jority of the cases that it was expected ex-pected would be tried went over for the term. In the case of the State of Utah, vs. James Harter, charged with grand larceny, the defendant was arraigned, arraig-ned, pleaded not guilty, but owing to one of the principal witnesses for the defendant being out of the State, the case went over for the term. In the case of the State vs. May Morgan and Frank Murray, charged with burglary in the second degree, the defendants were arraigned and pleaded not guilty. They were tried before a jury, the defendants being represented by C. T. Woodbury and Sam Cline, who were appointed by the court to represent the defendants. defend-ants. The defendant, Ray Morgan, claimed to be under the age of 18 years, and the jury so found, and he was remanded to the custody of the probation officer. Frank Murray was found guilty as charged in the in formation, and will be sentenced on Monday the 17th. In the Matter of the Estate of John W. McAllister, deceased, order entered, directing the administrator to sell the real and personal property belonging to the estatae. Jeanne Rose Notini, vs. Ralph No-teni No-teni interlocutory decree of divorce di-vorce granted to the plaintiff, with costs taxed to the defendant. In the,Matter of the Guardianship of Joseph H. and Susie" Greenwood,, minors the objections to final report re-port filled by guardian was heard and considered by the court, and no merit in said objections being found, the said report was approved by the court. Oren Burke vs A. L. Fothering-ham Fothering-ham This came on for trial being appealed from the Justice court, and was tried before the court without a jury. The decision of the court was that the case be dismissed at plaintiff's costs. Marie Krause vs J. W. Krause an interlocutory decree of divorce was granted to plaintiff, and the right to plaintiff to resume her maiden mai-den name, Marie Reddick, and the defendant was ordered to pay to the court $50 attorney's fees and costs. Ethel Lichty vs. Luke Bennett Lichty interlocutary decree of divorce di-vorce granted to plaintiff, with care and custody of minor child, and $30 per month alimony and costs. Joseph Jackson vs. Samuel Jackson Jack-son suit to quiet title to certain real estate. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff according to the prayer of the complaint. Henry Clinton McShane vs. Vilate McShane interlocutory decree of di vorce granted to the plaintiff on the ground of desertion and cruelty. In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Milford Mercantile company, a corporation after hearing the evidence, evi-dence, an order was entered dissolving dissolv-ing the said corporation. Milford Lumber Company vs. E. Tanner upon the stipulation of the parties it was ordered that Elmer and Mathews, contractors, be made co-defendants in the action. In the Matter of the Estate of Louis Lou-is Skouris, deceased an order was made by the court approving the account ac-count of the administrator, and upon the filing of the proper vouchers showing the the disbursements had been made according to the decree of distribution, the administrator was to then be discharged. James A. Moves et al. vs. Moses Edwards et al This case was tried in part at the last terra of court, but owing to sickness of counsel for defendants, de-fendants, the case was continued for this term; and owing to absence of counsel for plaintiff, the case was continued until next term, and the plaintiff to pay the cost incurred during dur-ing this session. F. M. Shroedcr vs. Reese M. Joseph Jos-eph demurrer of defendant over-ruled over-ruled and fifty days to answer. I Mar?' E. Parsons et al. vs. X. c. Srhow demurrer of defendant ov- erruled, and it appearing that one of the pjj.intiffs was dead, plaintiff was allowed to substitute the admin-instrator admin-instrator for deceased, and the defendant de-fendant was given fifty days to answer ans-wer after such substitution. In the Matter of the Estate of O. Forgie-Joest, deceased Grace Mc-Cullum, Mc-Cullum, heretofore appointed administratrix ad-ministratrix of said estate but having hav-ing failed to qualify1, and having joined in the request that O. S. White be appointed administrator, the court so ordered and fixed the bonli at $2000. ' In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah Sar-ah Bradshaw, deceased, order entered, enter-ed, directing the administrator to convey to E. E. Meyers, an interest in a certain real estate in Minersville, Miners-ville, which was given as security on a certain promissory note, upon the payment of said note. Western' Loan & Building company com-pany vs F. C. Kessler upon consent con-sent of counsel for defendant his murrer was overruled, and forty days was given to answer. Western Loan & Building company com-pany vs. Mary A. Briggs same order or-der as above. ' Beaver County vs Niel McMillan same order as above. , Jennie L. Robinson vs. Milford State Bank same order. Verle C. McGarry vs John C. Mc-Garry Mc-Garry plaintiff granted an interlocutory inter-locutory decree of divorce, and sole custody of minor child, the property rights having been settled out of court. In the following cases the interlocutory inter-locutory decrees heretofore entered were made final: Gomer O. Good-speed Good-speed vs Harry J. Goodspeed. Geneva Ge-neva V. Vincent vs Dan S. Vincent. Edna La Tourette vs. Glen S. LaTourette, Christina Brumley vs. Wm. B. Brumley and May Delia Grimshaw vs Lawrence Grimshaw. J. R. Watkins Co. vs Heap Vernon et al demurrer overruled and thirty thir-ty days given to answer. In the Matter of the Estate of Wick Mason, deceased by stipulation stipula-tion of the attorneys herein, W. F. Knox Esq. was appointed administrator adminis-trator of the estate and his bond fixed fix-ed at $100. In the Matter of the Estate of Louise Smith, deceased final account ac-count approved and distribution of the estate ordered. Western Loan & Building company com-pany vs. H. A. Simms E. B. Jor-gensen Jor-gensen appointed receiver and his bond fixed at $500. Bob Barreta vs. John Turley judgment on default of plaintiff in the sum of $475. interest $145, costs $16. Attorney's fees $6 2. Boh Baretta vs Leo Louis on mo tion of counsel for defendant the court ordered that a cost bond In the sum of $300 be furnished by the plaintiff. Rob Baretta vs James Rawlins on motion of counsel for defendant the court ordered that a cost bond in the sum of $100 be furnished by ! plaintiff. I Bob Baretta vs A. L. Dotson same order as above. |