OCR Text |
Show ) WEEKLY NEWS JOURNAL, NORTH DAVIS LEADER. DECEMBER 30, 1981 sion on the" Proposed Redeboundary of said REFLEX-DA- VIS velopment Plan for the Kaysville Downtown Redevelopment Project (Planning Commission Report), everything contained in the record of the Hearing and all evidence and testimony for or against the adoption of the Proposed Redevelopment Plan submitted to it at or prior to the Hearing; WHEREAS the Planning Commission, Agency staff and consultants, and certain Kaysville citizens have recommended various modifications of the Redevelopment Plan, many of which have been in- LIE(ML SS(DTTO(CIBS NOTICE OF TRUSTEES SALE for the purpose of paying obligations secured by said Deed of Trust including fees, The following described charges and expenses of Trustee, advances, if any, under the terms of said Deed, interest thereon and the unpaid principal of the Note secured by said Deed of Trust with interest thereon as in said Note and by law provided. Dated: December 14, 1981 property will be sold at public auction to the highest bidder on the 6th day of January, 1982 at 11:00 A.M. at the North front door of the Davis County Court House at Farmington, Utah in the County of Davis, by SECURITY TITLE COMPANY, as Trustee under the Deed of Trust made by Tom A. Hayes and Nancy Hayes, his wife, as Trustors, and recorded June 27, 1979 as Entry No. 536498 in Book 777 at pages 187 of the Official Records of Davis County, Utah, given to secure an indebtedness in favor of Christopher S. Lloyd and Carole Lloyd, his wife (now owned and held by Christopher S. Lloyd and Carole Lloyd) by reason of the breach of certain obligations secured thereby. Notice of Default was recorded August 26, 1981 as Entry No. 599248 in Book 877 at page 784 of said Official Records. Trustee will sell at pub-- , lie auction to the highest bidder for cash, payable in lawful money of the United States at the time of sale, without warranty as to title, possession or encumbrances, the following described property at 1354 West 1170 North, in the City of Farmington, County of Davis, State of Utah: All of Lot 12, SECURITY Neighborhood Development Act, as amended; that it would further the interests of the public peace, health, safety and welfare; that the adoption and carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan is economically sound and feasible; and that a number of other appropriate - reasons call for the adoption and implementation of the Redevelopment Plan: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF KAYSVILLE CITY: SECTION 100 Adoption of Sheriff, Davis County By Kathleen Czech Deputy Sheriff -- The following described property will be sold at public auction to the highest bidder on the 13th day of January, 1982 at 11:00 A.M. at the North front door of the Davis County Court House at Farmington, Utah in the County of Davis, by SECURITY TITLE COMPANY, as Trustee under the Deed of Trust made by Dcka Investments, Inc., as Trustors, and recorded September 8. 1980 as Entry No. 573576 in Book 838 at pages 480-of the Official Records of Davis County. Utah, given to 2 secure an indebtedness in favor of Country Hills Inc., a Utah Corporation (now owned and held bv Country Hills Inc., a Utah Corporation) by reason of the breach of certain obligations secured thereby. Notice of Default was recorded September II. 1981 as Entry No. 6(8)142 in Book 879 at page 148 of said Official Records. Trustee w ill sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, payable in lawful money of the United Slates at the time of sale, without warranty as to title, possession or encumbrances, the following described property in the County of Davis, State of Utah: Beginning at a point South 89 degrees 34'55" East 99. 18 feet along the Section line to the East right of way line of Highway 89 and North I degree 52 West 137.9 feet and Northerly along the arc of a I degree curve to the right 207.0 feet along said Highway and South 89 degrees 34'55" East 324.0 feet and North 89 1 1 the Redevelopment Plan would redevelop the Redevelopment Project Area in conformity with the Utah BRANT L. JOHNSON NOTICE OF TRUSTEES SALE Southwest corner of WHEREAS the City Council has determined that the owners of a majority of the area of the property included within the Project Area proposed in the Redevelopment Plan, excluding property owned by public agencies or dedicated to public use, either have not objected in writing to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, or, because objections were withdrawn at or prior to the Hearing, did not object in writing as of the end of the Hearing; and WHEREAS the City Council finds and determines that 1981. 17, 1981 31. 1981 Section 13, Township 4 North, Range I West. Salt Lake Meridian, and running thence North 0 20 East degrees 269.0 feet to a fence: thence North 89 degrees 4527 East 521.47 feet along said fence; thence South 0 degrees IU20" West 620 feet; thence South 89 degrees 45'27" West 521.47 feet: thence North 0 degrees IU20 East 350.1 feet to the point of beginning. 15, 1981; All inventory and Re- East whether written or oral .except insofar as such objections are the basis for the modifications made by the Agency in its Resolution No. 11 of December trade fixtures belonging to defendant. PURCHASE PRICE PAYABLE in lawful money of the United States of America. SUBJECT to any liens. Dated at Farmington, Utah, this 24th day of December, flex 45-2- 7 or prior to the Hearing, Corporation defendant TO BE SOLD AT SHERIFFS SALE at Hillgate Market, Hillgate Shopping Plaza, Layton, Utah on the 6th day of January, 1982, at the hour of 12: Noon all right, title, and interest of said defendant, Alpha Financial Corporation, in and to the following described personal property, to wit: By Gordon Gurr Its Owner and Sole Proprietor 181.11 feel from the 1 ALPHA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, A Utah SECURITY TITLE COMPANY, degrees C80-4- WILLIAM F. MC NEALY plaintiff, vs. of Trust including fees, 1 velopment Project as modified on December 15, 1981 (the Redevelopment Plan) by its Resolution No. 13, also dated December 15, 1981, and has submitted the Redevelopment Plan to the Kaysville City Council; WHEREAS the City Council concurs in the modifications made by the Agency and has overruled all objections to the adoption of the Proposed Redevelopment Plan and-o- r the Redevelopment Plan received by the City Council at ON charges and expenses of Trustee, advances, if any, under the terms of said Deed, interest thereon and the unpaid principal of the Note secured by said Deed of Trust with interest thereon as in said Note and by law provided. Dated: December 2, 1981 First publication Dec. Last publication Dec. Issue No. 46 Plan for the Kaysville Downtown Rede- TITLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 1 Published in The Weekly W'HEREAS the Agency has approved and adopted the NOTICE OF PLAT A, a subdivision of part of Sections 13 and 14, Township 3 North, Range West, Salt Lake Meridian, in the City of Farmington, according to the official plat thereof, for the purpose of paying obligations secured by said Deed .Trustee Plan; SHERIFFS SALE COUNTRY -- Proposed Redevelopment Published in The Weekly Reflex First publication Dec. 17, 1981 Last publication Dec. 31, 1981 Issue No. 46 ESTATES, - 1 By Gordon Gurr Its Owner and Sole Proprietor Civil No. Attorney: Rodney S. Page - Davis County Attorney 50 East State St. Farmington, Uah 84025 Telephone: 6 Published in the Davis County Clipper on Dec. 30, 1981 Issue No. 50 Published in The Weekly flex on Dec. 31, 1981 Issue No. 48 (he Plan The Kaysville City Council Re- hereby approves and adopts the Redevelopment Plan for the Kaysville Downtown Redevelopment Project as modof ified by Resolution No. the Agency on December 15, ORDINANCE NO. 242 1 1 1981. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT SECTION PLAN FOR THE KAYSVILLE Rede- velopment Plan by the Agencys Resolution No. 1 of December 15, 1981 modifying the COMPANY, Trustee OAK-R1DG- E CLUB corporated into the DOWN-TOW'- N REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (AS MODIFIED BY THE KAYSVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ON DECEMBER 15, 1981) AS THE OFFICIAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE KAYSVILLE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA. WHEREAS both the Kays-vill- e Redevelopment Agency (Agency) and the Kaysville Planning Commission (Planning Commission) have determined in their respective reports prepared in connection with the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Kaysville Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Kaysville Downtown Redevelopment Project to be prepared; WHEREAS the Planning Commission! and the Redevelopment Agency have recommended the adoption of the Proposed Redevelopment Plan: W HEREAS a duly noticed joint public hearing on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan was held by the Agency and the City Council on December 10. 1981 and continued on Decemher 15. 1981 (the Hearing"); WHEREAS the City Council has considered the Agencys Report to Accompany the Kaysville Downtown Redevelopment Plan (Agency Report") including the Report and Recommendations of the Kaysville Planning Commis De- scription The legal description of the boundaries of the Kaysville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area ("Project Area") is as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Block 29, Plat A, Kaysville Townsite lo- cated in Section 34, T4N , R1W, SLM; thence South along the East boundary of 100 East Street to the intersection of the South boundary of Center Street, a distance of 1,161.60 feet; thence West along the South boundary of said Center Street to the center of Block 6 Plat A", Kaysville Townsite, a dis- Downtown Redevelopment Project ("Proposed Rede- velopment Plan") that conditions of age, obsolescence, deterioration. dilapidation, economic deterioration and stagnation and other similar indications of blight exist within the Redevelopment Project Area selected by the Agency (the Project Area"); WHEREAS the Kaysville City Council (City Council") concurs in the findings of the Agency and the Planning Commission that the Project Area is a blighted area; WHEREAS the Agency in consultation with the Planning Commission has caused the 200 Legal , tance of 330 feet: thence South through the middle of said Block 6 to the intersection of the South boundary of 100 South Street, a distance of 594 feet: thence West along the South boundary of said 100 South Street, a distance of 496 feet; thence North, a distance of 198 feet; thence East a distance of 32 feet; thence North, a distance of 132 feet; thence West, a distance of 25 feet; thence North, a distance of 32 feet; thence West, 1 a distance of 7 feet; thence North to the intersection of the South boundary of Center Street, a distance of 132 feet: thence East along the South boundary of said Center Street, a dis- tance of 31.18 feet; thence North to the intersection of the South boundary of 100 North Street, a distance of 580.80 feet; thence West along the South boundary of said 100 North Street to the Northeast corner of Block 17, Plat "A", Kaysville Town-sita distance of 229.18 feet; thence North along the West boundary of 100 West Street, a dis- tance of 257.4 feet; thence East to the East ness and ottice space uses into the Project Area; D. (Sec. 340) To rehabilitate and modernize structures along the west side of Main Street; (Sec. 350 To avoid frag- 100 West Street a distance of 66 feet; thence North along the East boundary ' of said 100 West Street a distance of 66 feet; thence East to the intersection of the West mentation of land uses; and-o- boundary of Main F. (Sec. 360) To take any or all additional steps which may be appropriate or necessary to promote or further the aim of improving the Project Area (and, Street, a distance of 264 feet; thence North along the West boundary of said Main Street, a distance of 96.7 feet; thence West, a distance of 138 feet; thence North, a distance of 43.3 feet; thence West to the intersection of the West boundary of 100 West Street, a distance of 204 feet; thence South along the West boundary of said 100 West Street to the middle of Block 32, Plat Kaysville Town-sita distance of 140 feet; thence West to the West boundary of Block 35, Plat Kaysville Townsite, a distance of A, indirectly, surrounding areas) and preventing further deterioration within that Area.) SECTION 400 The Redevelopment Plan The Redevelopment Plan as modified by resolutions of the Agency and the City Council on December 15, 1981 (the Redevelopment Plan) and the Report to Accompany the Kaysville Downtown Redevelopment Plan, including the Report and Recommendations e, A, 1918.80 feet; thence North along the West of the Kaysville Planning Commission on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Kaysville Downtown Rede- ' boundary of said Block 35 to the intersection of the North boundary of 200 North Street, a dis- velopment Project, are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 500 Designation of the Redevelopment Plan as the Official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area The Redevelopment Plan which has been approved by the Agency is hereby adopted tance of 357.4 feet; thence East along the North boundary of said 200 North Street to the intersection of the West boundary of 400 West Street, a distance of 164 feet more or less; thence North along the West boundary of said 400 West Street to the intersection of the Southerly boundary of Utah Highway 106, a distance of 1174.4 feet; thence in a Northeasterly direction to a point on the Northerly boundary of said State Highway 106 and approved by the City Council and designated as the official redevelopment plan of the Kaysville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area. SECTION 600 Findings and Determinations of the City Council The City Council hereby makes the following findings and determinations: A. (Sec. 610) Blight. The Project Area is a blighted area, the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes of where the Highway changes bearing, a distance of 1 10 feet more or less; thence in a Southeasterly direction along the Northerly boundary of said State Highway 106, a distance of 103.6 feet; thence North 150 feet; ,4 5 167.82 feet; thence along the Southerly boundary of said 600 North Street, a distance of 260 feet; thence South 43 degs 14 East, a distance of 711.56 feet; thence North 43 degs 35 a distance of 260.41 feet; thence South 43 degs 14' East, a distance of 743.08 feet; thence North 68 degs 42 East, to the intersection of the Easterly boundary of 30 West Street, a distance of 136.60 South 34 degs 1030 East along the y of Easterly said 30 West Street to the intersection of the Northerly boundary of Crestwood Road, a distance of 394.86 feet; thence North 67 degs 25 East along the Northerly d boundary of said Road to the intersection of the East boundary of Fairfield fect;-then- right-of-wa- Crest-woo- Road a distance of 53 .78 feet; thence 1 South 17 degs East a 14 distance of 66 feet; thence along the arc of a curve having a radius of 858.5 feet along the Easterly boundary of said Fairfield Road a distance of 263.59 feet; thence South 0 Act, as amended. F. (Sec 660) Eminent Domain. The condemnation of real property is authorized pursuant to Sec 303 of the Redevelopment Plan. If it becomes necessary to exercise this power in the execution of the Redevelopment Plan, it may be used only if adequate provisions have been made for payment for property to be acquired as required by law. (Sec 670) Relocation. The SECTION 700 Availability of Replacement Housing The Relocation Rules, which govern relocation of persons displaced from the Project Area under the Redevelopment Plan as indicated in Sec. 670 hereof, provide in Sec. 500 thereof that no person shall be required to move from his dwelling on account of any project of the Agency, unless the Agency Governing Board is satisfied that replacement housing is available to this person." Since a project cannot go forward unless this conditions is met, the Kaysville City Council is satisfied permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time occupants of the Project Area may be or are displaced and that pending the development of such facilities there will be available to such displaced occupants adequate temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the community at the time of their displacement. SECTION 800 Effective Date This Ordinance shall become effective 20 days after publication or posting, or on December 30, 1981, whichever is sooner. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF KAYSVILLE. UTAH this 15 day of December, 1981. GAR T. ELISON Mayor Attest: Dean Steel City Recorder Published in The Weekly Re- flex on Dec. 30, 1981 Issue No. 48 indicated in Sec. 670 hereof, also provide in Sec 500 thereof that no person shall be required to move or be relocated from land used as his residence and acquired under any of the cone demnation or eminent domain laws of this state until he has been offered a comparable replacement dwelling adequate to accommodate this person, reasonably accessible to public services and places of employment, and available on the private market. Thus, there are or will be provided in the Project Area or in other areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons displaced from the Project Agency has a feasible method of plan for the relocation of families and persons displaced from the Project Area, to the extent that the Redevelopment Plan may result in the tem- porary or permanent displacement of any occupants of housing facilities in the Project Area, in that Sec. 312 of the Redevelopment Plan specifies that the Relocation Rules and Regulations for Implementation of the Utah Relocation Assistance Act for the Kaysville Downtown Redevelopment Project (Relocation Rules) shall govern relocation of persons, Area, decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings equal in Agencys Report to South 46 degs 46 West East, evelopment ably accessible to their place of employment. amended (Utah Code Ann. et seq.) in Section view of the various existing conditions outlined in the 28 thence North 18 degs 45 East, a distance of 127 feet; thence North 0 degs 30 East, a distance of 99.03 feet; thence South 70 degs 3950 East, a distance of 5.45 feet; thence North 0 degs 30 East, a distance of 100.85 feet; thence North 43 degs 55 East, a distance of 217.44 feet;; thence North 71 degs. 02 East, a distance of 238.7 feet; thence South 62 degs 01 East, a distance of 105.6 feet; thence South 43 degs 14 East to the Southerly boundary of 600 North Street, a distance of en-titi- es the Utah Neighborhood Development Act, as degs 10 East, a distance of 364 feet; thence North 59 degs 27 West, a distance of 90 feet; thence North 66 degs 45 East, a distance of r number to the number of and available to such families and persons as may be displaced by the Redevelopment Plan and reason- businesses, and other displaced by Agency action. Sec. 500 of the Relocation Rules in turn specifies that "(no person shall be required to move from his dwelling on account of any project of the Agency, unless the Agency Governing Board is satisfied that replacement housing is available to this person. That is, unless a feasible method or plan for relocation exists, execution of the Redevelopment Plan cannot go forward. Moreover as indicated in Section IV of the Agency Report, it is not expected that any extensive problems of this nature will be encountered. H. (Sec. 680) Relocation Dwellings. The Relocation Rules which govern relocation of persons displaced from the Project Area under the Redevelopment Plan as amended, in that it would promote and facilitate: 1 (651) The elimination or reduction of blight in the Project Area; 2. (Sec. 652) Measures which would prevent further stagnation, deterioration and-o- r fragmenation within the Project Area; 3. (Sec. 653) The revitalization of the Project Area; and 4. (Sec. 654) Other measures which would promote the public peace, health, safety, and welfare and which would be consistent with the purposes of the Utah Neighborhood D- degs 34'04" West to the intersection of the South boundary of 200 North Street, a distance of 692.4 feet; thence West along the South boundary of said 200 North Street to the intersection of the East boundary of 100 East Street a distance of 160 feet more or less, to the point of beginning. SECTION 300 Purposes and Intent of City Council The purposes and intent of the City Council with respect to the Project Area are as follows: A. (Sec. 310) To reduce and eliminate existing blight and to prevent further deterioration within the Project Area: B. (Sec. 320) to revitalize the core of downtown Kaysville; C. (Sec. 330) To establish a neighborhood retail center and-o- r a community retail center, thereby attracting increased retail busi- - , Accompany the Kaysville Downtown Redevelopment Plan (the Agency Report which is incorporated herein by this reference. Nothing herein shall be construed to imply that the Agency Report exhaustively describes all the conditions of blight within the Project Area. B. (Sec. 620) Conformity with Utah Neighborhood Development Act and Other Public Purposes. The Rede- velopment Plan would re-- . develop the Kaysville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area in conformity with the Utah Neighborhood Development Act as Snow Tire Sale Snow Tires amended (Utah Code et Annotated Sec. seq.) and in the interests of the public peace, health safety and welfare in that: 1. (Sec 621) It would enable the Agency to make financing alternatives available to parties electing to become participants in the Redevelopment Project and to private developers, thereby providing additional stimulus to investment, redevelopment, rehabilitation, and the elimination of blight within the Project Area; 2. (Sec. 622) It would help to prevent erosion of Kaysvilles economic base; 3. (Sec. 623) It would help to prevent fragmenta- tion of commercial land uses within the Project Area; 4. (Sec. 624) It would help to create a buffer zone around Kaysvilles original core residential area west of Main Street, thereby helping to prevent further deterioration in that area; 5. (Sec. 625) It would contribute in a variety of other ways to the redevelopment of the Project Area in conformity with the Utah Neighborhood velopment Act, De- as amended, and to furthering the interests of public peace, health, safety and welfare. C. (Sec. 630) Feasibility. The adoption and carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan is economically sound and feasible in that under Section 601 of the Redevelopment Plan, redevelopment projects under the Plan which form parts of the overall Redevelopment Project contemplated by the Plan will proceed and be carried out only if and when financing becomes available, based upon the willingness of public and private entities to invest and develop in the Project Area. D. (Sec. 640) Conformity to Comprehensive Plan. The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the Kaysville City Comprehensive Plan. E. (Sec 650) Effects of Carrying out the Redevelopment Plan. The carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan would promote the public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the community and would effectuate the purposes and policy of the Utah Neighborhood DAct as evelopment on All Save (does not include all weather tires) on Save 25 All Snow Chains Import Truck Tool Boxes CQOO Now 129.99 JO Reg. Save $20 2 wheel front disc Single axle brake overhaul. Reg. 79.88 S3I0 59 Complete brake overhaul for most American and Import cars. We'l rebuild cylinders or calipers, resurface drums or rotors, Install new finings, eeale, strinos. Adjust parking brake, bleed, refill hydraulic system. reg. 16.88 reg. 16.88 Mileagemaker wheel alignment. Oil, filter Improves tire wear and makes for improved road handling. WeB adjust caster, camber and toe to manufacturers specifications. and lube. Includes labor, 5 qts. 10-3- 0 oil chassis lube and oil filter Bountiful Store 101 West 1600 North 298-261- 9 |