Show COURTS OF conciliation the most recent thing in modern jurisprudence is the court of aaion it has been in use in iowa for a short time with as we are informed perfect success and the legislature or north dakota recently brought it into existence in that state there is ie no dedal newness claimed claimer lor or the plau plan by which this court operates but its practical application la is alt altogether agether recent ita purpose being the cation ol of legal proceedings rather tha anan n their compi complication matlon very much needed almost any one will say at A the outset according to the st paul pau pioneer press tile the north norm dakota statute pro aids t dalt at any ejection eject iou in a town ur or alty city of a justice of the peace there shall ahall be elected at the same and for the same term ul office four of con tuese are lo 10 cllia cinat uon iod serve t WO two at a time with the justice in hearing bearin if th the 3 pleadings ana testimony lestino mODY ouy to in civil cadee before the is luio court lu in tue tile usual mauner manner tuese art are to be conducted without attorneys anil and the statements or of tue tile principals in we action will be the chiel alter after hearing both boin sides it its ia the duty duly of the justice sud aud the to try aud and bring about an ing oe between tween the two parties on the IMIS of justice and to remove il if possible tile necessity for the more cormal legal action A provision of the jaw is w that none of tue ine proceedings eLlings lu in tuu tue court of conciliation shall ke be used as ILI 1 soy y action aalon which may follow allow it tile the hearing does nut not bring about the desired result the uee decrease ue crease rease 1111 in litigation which these theme courts of conciliation are supposed to effect is perhaps their greatest recommendation the bick eringa between neighbors little ruptures here slid and there and small claims ono one way and another an otner by means of these courts would flud find a ope speedier cheaper and more inore satisfactory c they sene generally rally do now under another name ame this ebis plan and arbitration are the same thing the utah statutes for settlements apart from courts that are afterwards given the lull full borce and effect of judgments by being so no entered en and J iu all the communities of he latte rd saints the settlement ol of controversies sou and disputes without recourse to court or lawyer is wll well 80 popular anti effective jo Is the mormon plan a 0 arbitration that on many litigants who were not of our faith have craved the privilege or of trying their causes before tribunals and having obtained permission nave have submit submitted teu with sa as is faction to the decision rendered feeling that justice between man and man hau bau been sought by the court ano and given accordingly it must needs be we presume that differences come but lh there ere is 18 no need that in their settlement meoL the ebb parties in seeking technical nic ai advantage rather t than ban juh jud tice shall impoverish themselves to fatten a lot of law twisters and mis chief breeders bleeders if we cannot have arbitration pure and simple let us at lel least have something direct easy and inexpensive which the north dakota burt of conciliation seems to be 3 |