Show TALE difference I 1 in ID toe the first district court at og deni january 8 wore before judge hen derain wm br maughan of wellsville carahe cache county was called for sentence in ill 1886 1885 thoin found against him for unlawful cohabitation the division being made anthe segregation plan mr maughan was not arrested at th time and later another indictment was found against him for the same offense this was made upon testimony given by kimseu bud and the jury because he had lived with hu hie plural wife woo also brought it a bill against him tor abr adultery to each of these charges a pl plea of guilty was entered when the defendant was called for sentence the he first indictment wim wag dismissed the other three being retained it was wail stated to the court that mr maughan had against and by ids courlis cauree throughout had saved aved the government conrader able expense he hetti wm 66 56 yeso of ct age and had married his hib wives in 1860 ma and I 1 1880 his youngest youn gett child by the emild born in arl april ISM 1 I 1 judge fH enderson theft made totne remarks about to defendant having been proceeded against iby the go government in 1885 but he hild had not rendered obed lemee to the ja law and nd would have him undo the mafit the senti nae wax wa then passed th the 6 penalty on the adultery charge being for fortio two and a half years witt six of the extreme penalty and payment of costs casu on the unlawful cohabitation charges IW he was sentenced to six months each the full penalty mid aad a fine of on each ing the fines aggregate and the costs coate of the prosecution in three cases the court ordered that all three terms term commence at the same j ri u iiii ti ii iff 0 alb aph h i A kumpu 1 wa ao wak h i kivee with tto was vw loag in the jon jan agy 4 ww Sheen was ateo alm called bafry QU 00 day ifor teft ansbaw and pealed of fis doNery uw atif corp mUted waa mother maa ww wife whom Ws up t abe badge suspended fn an tenge auri gow of the busts ousts of taw pro tion |