Show TILE ABORTION CASE I 1 V S ATTORNEY DICKSON MANIFESTS A X TO SIFT gift IT TO tue tile BOTTOM 1 the police court this morning was the magnetic cynosure for that element ol of the street which linds finds one of its chief chlof amusements and occupations in ia drinking in tha I 1 details often disgusting lusting gusting but to them all the better lor tor that involved in trials and examinations I 1 which coma come under the jurisdiction trib tribunal the preliminary irl ln tho irona lOwler I 1 or evau emil la ex t in point polut ot of a uon von tod to tos agoti gli oti I 1 ti IN f arts la t t 1 anticipation of its being proceeded with in this however the audience were doomed to disappointment iu in a measure as will appear at the hour set get lor for lor tor the examination elimination ila lla halt hait lis ils p past ast 10 judge spiers was 1 in it his place and within the rail were irons and fowler the accused parties judge snow county prose goutink attorney waddell his assistant mr lir fietcher fletcher and mr C S varian assistant U 8 Attorn Attar byi syi all of whom represent the prosecution 1 also bennett Ben nett nelt Hir Il kness and kirk patrick patriek 11 k representing dr fowler and trac 31 mr r represents mr irons drons irons there was also aiso present mr kimball of ogden who consulted with the others and mayor may not be numbered among amone the counsel for the defense the following witnesses were also aiso in attendance dr carnahan ogden augden Ug den mrs evans mr and mrs guando jeratt JL brigham jones professor andrews mrs neilson tiie tile the midwife dr JS richards elch rich ards dr H hamilton a and dr bowers after consulting sol some moments together ether there was wa a movement among the ihbe attorneys and judge snow addressing the court announced that the defense desired a continuance for one week As a basis for this a doctors certificate to the effect that mrs airs john AV irons nee miss lizzle lizzie evans the prosecuting witness was in it too lel iel delicate lei acate a state of health to appe arwas presented at this point mr air W H dickson united states status attorney who is acting as an assistant in the prosecution entered the court and on learning what had been proposed objected to the continuance lettin letting doy daylight light through the proposition to that end by stating that the sickness of a prosecuting witness was no ground for the defense in in oving moving for a postponement pon ement the prosecution he said wanted the examination to proceed judge spiers overruled tile tiie motion to continue the attorneys for the respective defendants then made a joint proposition to waive the invest investigation igi ti ou and let the case go to the grand 1 lury jury u r Y and asked the court to fix lix tile tiie amount of bail ball required require a mr dickson stated that he be had no mo objection to its being waived so far as the defense was was concerned out lor for the prosecution he insisted that the examina proceed and that evidence be ba introduced for that side mr nir kirkpatrick replied that it would atwould be a great injustice to the defendants owing to the heat beat and excitement that had been caused to introduce testimony and have it published broadcast at this stage of the case and as the only object in its introduction was to the court to fix the amount of bail he be proposed that the bail be ed at any aino arno amount urit and it would be furnished however large lie he claimed the right of the to waive particularly ticul arly as aa the grand jury was now in session and the case could go right up without delay mr dickson contended that the object in now taking evidence was to i preserve it in case of the death or fu ture lure absence of 0 the witnesses the testimony taken before the grand jury was secret and could not be used in a prosecution elution in the tha district court I 1 an and in drw view of the pos possible sible sibie death or absence of witnesses when wanted I 1 who were now at hand and ready to i testify he insisted that their depositions be made taken down signed and sworn to that they might be used by the tile prosecution in the district court ifft it it became necessary rec essary reclaimed lie lle claimed to be able to produce authorities that would bear him hinl out in this position 0 h i tion thu the court decided to duier ueler 1 r action till 2 to enable mr LU ickson dickson to get ret his bis authorities a proceeding a acquiesced qui s ed iu in by the other side who aiho proposed to bringslid brins bring slin similar data in opposition to the stand taken by by thu the prosecution at atz ata 0 clock ehe ehu case was resumed jude judge spiers decided that the examination u of witnesses lor for the thu prosecution go on and that it should be conducted with closed doors and the public excluded |