Show COL COLI L L ED f BUTLER i IS I NOT T IL T I Jury Says He lie le lid Did li Not Brute Bribe Nine Nineteen Nineteen teen Members of House HOlse of Delegates SHOOK HANDS WITH VITo EACH JUROR ci lolk foli Tor fil He lie le Thought the time State Had a Case Fulton lull Mo Io Fel F h Th Jury JUly jum In III II the case ell rf rt Col ol oh Kd Ed d nutter the time millionaire St Louis lolls on trial on nn n a charge of or bribing IS I 1 of tie the til house haute of or orIc delegates Ic n lea of ot St 81 today todo returned a verdict of ot not Ilot guilty the tl verdict was vim read mead a n dozen of Col tl 01 gave Gal mirth forth a it I wild shout hout and anil ditched out Olt In lOi time the street to the tile ii 5 Hillier stepped lu ly shook hool bands bunds with wih Furman II man 10 Ker Then rhen he lie walked down the tho Ihl line lne of shaking hands lh Within u t few Cel minutes Judge draw Ur 1 polled the JI ami discharged Friends surrounded Col Vol 01 humid Duller and 1111 he tie held an informal levee laugh tag lint If and amid n nd Joking with wih those tho e bOllt I him When ho lie finished shaking with lh the time Jury Col Cal Hutler turned to 10 his son somi SOl Eddie the tIme blacksmith There TherO were tears tear i In the thi old mans 1011 eyes II and ammi the time young man 1181 unable to speak grubbed grabbed his fa In father timer ther and alli kissed him hll ISel the Atty At Att Folk who wms WIS In hi 11 the tho courtroom appeared dumbfounded 1 I thought time the state lint hall a n good goodcase Cle case he II said aid that I 1 have hoo nothing to say arty nt at It this time 11 About 18 IS tallou won wen accord according and ami at III the time start stait ing n to o Foreman Hos HOM cr time the Jury Jur stood stol 10 for acquittal nil and two tO for fOl Conviction One Omme of ot those these voting to convict changed after tb th tIme first ballot wild Mr r I The Time other nina man lan hold hell out Olt stub I until 04 o lock ihla thin morning when he Ime finally camo caine into 1110 line hue lne hE The hp Jurors did lid not want to the defendant on OH the time testimony of bOOI toms lent 11 tie and nl aim 1 perjurers whose statements were tore flatly contradicted by b men of ot good gooe Jn t Again we did not think the tho circumstances Inh pointed to the time defend defendants ants guilt On 01 Ole Die he evidence of ot the state even though we IC thoroughly ere cre It I there thore was serious doubt OK as 11 to huLlers guilt Weighing the time farts facts care carefully carefully fully we ne e think wo vo 0 did dimi out our 0 full rul duty dil dilI and Impartially I fairly nl omit |