| Show I ll I M MI MY I f t DELAY tl Of Or Divorce Case Unless Un loss Creditors Attachment Case is Pre Previously Previously Settled d GOULD FAMILY PRIDE AN ASSET Count nt UI ut lo in II nII lam II of if I It lu I it Iun Ii I let Termite Iv Kept ept 1 Jl While no yet et been Wea In md made by b b the counts the tb attorneys ator for tor Or the Count COlli de Cas c evidently anticipate an n attempt on I II hie h part p to force for a delay deJ In th UI trial trl of the tb divorce case can which has baa bl been for fo Oct Oc 17 n unless the clod cred creditor ceo lt attachment ca c e U Ii I previously lou settled The TI rim count la Is l not hit unwilling to tn take lake tle every ever advantage of or the desire dere d dor of or th Ih countess and the Gould Could fatally family tal lo to make Helf to a told avoid further no notoriety and auld scandal endal but it I II Is Stilt still IU doubtful whether the Ile price is k not n two hO t high It 1 turns turn out that thaI the Ibe blue bills bia piled up UI by b the counts count creditors are very er numerous While the exact total is II riot not lt know the Ibe amount IK I authoritatively lively as ni n In 11 of f the settle refIt settlement tl taint ment the French law l regards the tho marriage partnership aa ac 11 making lius hUI band anti and wife equally responsible for forthe the flip household expenses and debts The attachment proceeding however hoe do 10 donot to tot not Itoh t tn to thin tM clans I They Th The arts An te al at most mOM entirely for tor money mP borrowed from usurer al at IM I f i and eon con consequently en sd d they could cul be bi b legally resist Th Til r count tUII ui has ha another lever leter In 11 the Ih deposition cJ of the children who wh under und ih hit law I HI I art Trench II I Mild and Ild sub subject ul Joel tn I Ii military He lie lE could en enIC lei IC a I plea 1 before the French P h court cur that if I tho Iho were given Riven Into the custody sf If if ih the mother they might b be betaken taken a bc td ond the I hf jurisdiction of ot Prance JIW Such action aI would result r ll In time the Ih opposition by the Ibl court of if restrictions lo to the In time the tutu If H the creditors attachment Is II set settled t tied out nut nf Ir 1 court the 11 iii count I it nut fbi lot ex expected IX t iii hI i make lak a and lt It I la Ii S believed that ibm Ihl divorce dh r will tic be II grant nl e Sd d Oct 17 It U lit a i that thaI the count will trump up UI a CRU for postponement |
